ClinicalMetric Research Team · Last Reviewed: June 2026 · Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA · NIH
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence — Key Facts
  • 400,000+ active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov across 200+ countries (2025)
  • Only ~12% of drugs entering clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval
  • Average clinical trial takes 6–13 years from Phase 1 to regulatory approval
  • ~40% of trials fail to recruit sufficient participants — the #1 reason trials stop early
  • All trials must register on ClinicalTrials.gov under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 2007)
← Back to Insights
Cell Therapy Last Reviewed: June 2026 CM-INS-141 // JUNE 2026

TIL and NK Cell Therapy Clinical Trials 2026: Amtagvi Approved, iPSC-NK Pipeline, and the Solid Tumor Frontier

The approval of Amtagvi (lifileucel) in February 2024 for advanced melanoma after PD-1 progression is a landmark that tends to get overshadowed by CAR-T's higher profile. It shouldn't. TIL therapy — taking tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from a patient's own tumor, expanding them massively ex vivo, and reinfusing them after lymphodepletion — works in solid tumors where CAR-T has largely failed. The C-144-01 pivotal trial showed 31.5% overall response rate in patients who had progressed through PD-1 inhibitors — a population that essentially has no remaining immunotherapy options. The median duration of response was 11.9 months, with 42% of responses ongoing at data cutoff. These are not dramatic numbers by hematologic cancer standards, but in a tumor type defined by resistance to PD-1, they represent real clinical benefit. The question for 2026 is whether TIL therapy can extend beyond melanoma.

Medical Notice

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. TIL and NK cell therapies require specialized treatment centers. Current approvals are limited to specific indications. Consult your oncologist to assess eligibility for available therapies or trials.

Summary

Amtagvi (lifileucel, Iovance Biotherapeutics) is FDA-approved for unresectable or metastatic melanoma after PD-1 and BRAF-targeted therapy (if BRAF V600E+). C-144-01 ORR 31.5%, median DOR 11.9 months. NK cell therapy is in Phase 1/2 using cord blood-derived (FT516, FT538, Fate Therapeutics) and iPSC-derived platforms. The iPSC-derived approach enables genetic engineering of NK cells with enhanced persistence (IL-15 signaling), targeting (CD16 optimization for ADCC), and anti-exhaustion features. TIL therapy is now in trials for NSCLC (IOV-COM-202 — lifileucel + pembrolizumab), cervical cancer, head and neck, and colorectal cancer. NK cell trials are active in AML, multiple myeloma, and solid tumors. Manufacturing timelines for TIL therapy are 3–4 weeks; NK cell therapy from iPSC is off-the-shelf.

ClinicalMetric Analysis

  • TIL therapy's complete responses, though infrequent, are durable in a way that distinguishes it from chemotherapy in post-PD-1 melanoma. In C-144-01, 4.4% of patients achieved complete response. That sounds modest. But complete responses in melanoma treated with TIL have historically shown remarkable durability — early NCI data from Steve Rosenberg's group includes patients with CR in excess of 5 years after a single TIL infusion. The biology makes sense: a TIL product contains T cells that have already been educated against the patient's own tumor antigens inside the tumor microenvironment, and a fraction of those T cells become long-lived memory cells. The short-duration partial responses pull down the aggregate durability statistics, but the CRs may be representing a genuinely curative subset.
  • NK cell therapy's lack of MHC restriction is a fundamental advantage that hasn't been fully exploited yet because persistence remains the primary limitation. T cells (including TIL and CAR-T) require MHC-peptide matching for target recognition, which is why allogeneic T-cell therapies cause GvHD. NK cells use MHC-independent killing via NKG2D, DNAM-1, and the missing-self mechanism (they preferentially kill cells that downregulate HLA — a common tumor escape mechanism). This means NK cells can theoretically work off-the-shelf without HLA matching. The clinical limitation is that NK cells expand poorly in vivo and are typically cleared within 2–4 weeks. iPSC-derived NK cells are now being engineered with IL-15 receptor β chain expression (hnCD16, membrane-bound IL-21, CISH knockout) to extend persistence while maintaining anti-tumor activity. FT576, Fate's most advanced iPSC-NK product for myeloma, showed responses at 2+ months post-infusion — a significant improvement over first-generation NK cell products.
  • The biggest unresolved question for TIL expansion to solid tumors is whether surgically inaccessible or poorly infiltrated tumors can yield a functional TIL product. Melanoma is ideally suited for TIL therapy: it is highly immunogenic, frequently resectable with tumor-draining lymph nodes, and generates TIL populations with diverse neoantigen recognition. Tumors like pancreatic cancer, which are desmoplastic, cold, and poorly infiltrated, generate TIL products that are quantitatively and qualitatively inferior. NSCLC is somewhere in between — immunogenic enough (especially in smokers with high mutational burden) to potentially yield functional TIL products, but with more variable infiltration than melanoma. The IOV-COM-202 trial's early TIL + pembrolizumab data in NSCLC will be informative about whether the melanoma success translates in a different tumor histology.

Amtagvi (Lifileucel): How It Works and What the Trial Showed

The lifileucel manufacturing process begins with surgical resection of a tumor fragment (ideally 1.5–2 cm³ of viable tumor). The tumor is enzymatically digested to produce single-cell suspensions; TIL populations are selected and undergo rapid expansion using OKT3 (anti-CD3 antibody) + high-dose IL-2 + irradiated feeder cells. The resulting product contains approximately 7.5 × 10⁹ TIL. Before infusion, patients undergo lymphodepletion (cyclophosphamide + fludarabine) to eliminate regulatory T cells and create cytokine "space" for TIL expansion. High-dose IL-2 is administered post-infusion to support TIL persistence.

C-144-01 (NCT02360579): 73 patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who had received PD-1 inhibitor and BRAF inhibitor (if BRAF V600E+). ORR 31.5% (23/73 patients). Median DOR 11.9 months (range 1.7+ to 35.2+ months). At data cutoff, 42% of responses ongoing. CR: 3 patients (4.4%). Responses were assessed centrally by irRC criteria. No formal comparison arm (single-arm trial), but historical ORR with current standard of care options post-PD-1 is approximately 5–15% for available chemotherapy or targeted therapy.

iPSC-Derived NK Cell Platforms: Fate Therapeutics and Beyond

Fate Therapeutics has built the most advanced iPSC-derived NK cell platform. Their process starts with a single iPSC master cell line that is gene-edited with multiple modifications before differentiation into NK cells: CD16 high-affinity Fc receptor (hnCD16) for enhanced ADCC with tumor-directed antibodies; IL-15/IL-15Rα fusion protein for autocrine cytokine support; CISH knockout to remove a negative regulator of cytokine signaling. The resulting iPSC-NK cells are differentiated in a defined protocol, cryopreserved, and deployed as an off-the-shelf product.

FT516 (targeting AML and NHL with anti-CD20 antibody combinations): Phase 1 data showing ORR of 23% as monotherapy and ~67% with rituximab in R/R NHL — suggesting the ADCC mechanism works. FT538 (BCMA-targeting for myeloma): Phase 1 data with anti-BCMA antibody combination. FT576 (BCMA-targeting CAR construct added to the iPSC backbone): Phase 1/2 in myeloma, responses at 10+ weeks post-infusion — meaningfully better persistence than first-generation NK products.

TIL Therapy Expansion Trials in 2026

Iovance Biotherapeutics has the most active TIL expansion program. IOV-COM-202 tests lifileucel in combination with pembrolizumab in NSCLC, head and neck, and bladder cancer — first-line in some cohorts, post-PD-1 failure in others. Early data (6-month interim) in NSCLC showed ORR 33% in the second-line cohort — encouraging but requiring larger follow-up. Iovance's cervical cancer program (IOV-SCC-01 and the TILVANCE-301 Phase 3) is in registration-directed trials. Cervical cancer is an interesting TIL target: it is HPV-driven (high neoantigen burden from viral proteins), frequently well-vascularized, and TIL populations enriched for HPV-specific T cells have shown deep responses in early trials.

Immatics (TCR-T cell therapy, distinct from TIL but related) targets MAGE-A4, WT1, and PRAME — cancer-testis antigens expressed in solid tumors. Their IMA203 product in Phase 2 showed 44% ORR in MAGE-A4-positive advanced solid tumors — NSCLC, melanoma, synovial sarcoma, head and neck. This bridges TIL and engineered TCR therapy.

Accessing TIL and NK Cell Trials

Amtagvi is available at Iovance-certified treatment centers in the US. Trial enrollment for TIL programs requires pathology-confirmed diagnosis of the eligible tumor type, adequate organ function, prior PD-1 therapy (for most post-PD-1 indications), and surgical feasibility for tumor harvest — this is a real eligibility constraint that requires a conversation between the patient, oncologist, and surgical team before referral. NK cell trials (Fate Therapeutics, Nkarta, Artiva Biotherapeutics) are at academic medical centers in the US and Europe; most require a hematologic diagnosis (AML, MM, NHL) with standard eligibility criteria. Search ClinicalTrials.gov using terms: "TIL," "tumor infiltrating lymphocyte," "FT516," "FT576," "lifileucel."

EK
◆ Founder & Platform Director
Efi Kara
Electrical & Computer Engineer · 30 years IT management · responsible for platform implementation, editorial direction, and growth strategy.
◆ Research & Analysis
IA
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
Clinical Research Analyst & ISO Inspector

B.Sc. Agricultural Sciences. ISO inspector and compliance auditor. Researches and writes ClinicalMetric Insights using primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EudraCT, PubMed.

◆ Medical Review
GA
Georgios Anagas
Medical Content Reviewer

Physiotherapy student. Reviews Insights articles for medical accuracy and patient relevance — condition descriptions, eligibility language, and treatment context for patients and caregivers.

⚕️ Patient-facing medical accuracy review
◆ Technical Review
AA
Achi Anagas
Platform & Data Infrastructure Lead

B.Sc. Informatics & Communications (in progress). Responsible for ClinicalMetric's technical architecture, API integrations with ClinicalTrials.gov, and data accuracy verification.

🔄 Trial data updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Editorial & Research Standards
Stage 1 — Primary Research
ClinicalTrials.gov registry data (NIH/NLM), FDA documentation, EudraCT, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, eligibility, and enrollment data verified at source.
Stage 2 — Medical Accuracy Review
Cross-checked against PubMed/MEDLINE literature and FDA/EMA communications. Eligibility criteria and patient safety information verified for accuracy.
Stage 3 — Registry Verification
Phase classification, enrollment status, sponsor identity, and trial location cross-referenced against official registry records before publication.
⚕️ Medical Disclaimer: ClinicalMetric provides research intelligence only. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making clinical decisions or participating in a trial.
Publisher
ClinicalMetric
Independent Clinical Trial Intelligence
Tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide. Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA IND registry, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register).
Research Methodology
Articles are researched from primary registry sources: ClinicalTrials.gov XML feeds, FDA trial databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, enrollment, and eligibility data is sourced directly from registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.
Primary Data Sources
Accuracy & Updates
Trial status, enrollment, and eligibility information changes frequently. ClinicalMetric syncs with ClinicalTrials.gov daily. Editorial articles are reviewed quarterly or when major protocol amendments are published. Always verify trial status directly on ClinicalTrials.gov before making clinical decisions.
◆ Live Clinical Trial Feed
Browse 400,000+ Active Clinical Trials
Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov · Recruiting trials by condition, phase, sponsor
Search Active Trials →
About ClinicalMetric → Research Methodology → Medical Disclaimer → LinkedIn →

Related Insights

Cell Therapy
CAR-T Cell Therapy Clinical Trials 2026
Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy Trials 2026
Melanoma
Melanoma Clinical Trials 2026
◆ Related Research Guides
Trial DesignAdaptive Clinical Trial Design 2026: Seamless Phases, Response-Adaptive Randomization, and Platform TrialsRead guide →Data ScienceAI in Clinical Data Management 2026: EDC, Risk-Based Monitoring, and eTMF AutomationRead guide →PulmonologyAsthma Clinical Trials 2026: Biologics for Severe Asthma & New TreatmentsRead guide →CardiologyAtrial Fibrillation Clinical Trials 2026: New Ablation Techniques, Anticoagulants & Reversal AgentsRead guide →
ClinicalMetric Intelligence Team
Clinical Trial Research & Analysis · Last updated April 2026
Analysis compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA trial registry data, and peer-reviewed clinical research. ClinicalMetric tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide, updated daily from the ClinicalTrials.gov AACT database.
Get Weekly Clinical Trial Alerts
New recruiting trials from NIH, NCI, and 40+ sponsors — every Monday. Free forever.
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence at a Glance
400K+
Active trials tracked
200+
Countries with active trials
4
Clinical trial phases
Daily
Data refresh from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Clinical Trial Phase Transition Success Rates
Phase 1 → Phase 2 success ~63%
Phase 2 → Phase 3 success ~32%
Phase 3 → Approval ~58%
Overall FDA approval rate ~12%
Source: Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) Clinical Development Success Rates — approximate industry averages.
◆ Clinical Trial Development Timeline
Mo 1–6
Preclinical + IND Filing
Mo 6–18
Phase 1 (Safety)
Mo 18–48
Phase 2 (Efficacy)
Mo 48–84
Phase 3 (Pivotal)
Mo 84–96
FDA Review / NDA
Mo 96+
Approval + Phase 4
Timeline is approximate. Total development from preclinical to approval averages 6–13 years.
About the Author
ClinicalMetric Research Team
Clinical Trial Intelligence Specialists · clinicalmetric.com
Our analysts monitor 400,000+ clinical trials daily across oncology, neurology, cardiology, and rare diseases. All data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA.gov.
🔬 400K+ trials tracked 🌍 200+ countries 🔄 Updated: June 2026
◆ Common Questions About Clinical Trials
What is a clinical trial? +
A clinical trial is a research study involving human participants designed to evaluate medical interventions — such as drugs, devices, or behavioral strategies. Trials follow a structured protocol and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. They progress through phases: Phase 1 (safety), Phase 2 (efficacy), Phase 3 (large-scale comparison), and Phase 4 (post-market surveillance).
How do I find clinical trials I'm eligible for? +
You can search ClinicalTrials.gov or use ClinicalMetric to filter by condition, phase, or location. Each trial listing includes eligibility criteria such as age range, sex, diagnosis, and prior treatment history. Contact the study team directly or ask your physician to refer you to a relevant trial.
Are clinical trials safe to participate in? +
Clinical trials are conducted under strict ethical and regulatory oversight, including IRB approval and FDA regulation in the US. All participants must give informed consent after reviewing potential risks and benefits. Phase 1 trials carry more uncertainty, while Phase 3 trials involve interventions with an established safety profile. Participation is always voluntary and you may withdraw at any time.
What are the phases of clinical trials? +
Clinical trials progress through four main phases. Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group (20–80 people). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects in a larger group (100–300). Phase 3 compares the intervention against standard treatments in thousands of participants. Phase 4 occurs after approval and monitors long-term effects in the general population.
Do participants get paid for joining clinical trials? +
Many clinical trials offer compensation for time and travel expenses, though payment structures vary widely by study. Compensation is not intended to be coercive. Some trials also cover treatment costs for participants. Always review the consent form carefully and ask the study coordinator about any financial considerations before enrolling.
Browse by Phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4
Browse by Condition
CancerDiabetesAlzheimer'sDepressionHeart DiseaseCOVID-19Parkinson'sMultiple Sclerosis
ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology