ClinicalMetric Research Team · Last Reviewed: June 2026 · Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA · NIH
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence — Key Facts
  • 400,000+ active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov across 200+ countries (2025)
  • Only ~12% of drugs entering clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval
  • Average clinical trial takes 6–13 years from Phase 1 to regulatory approval
  • ~40% of trials fail to recruit sufficient participants — the #1 reason trials stop early
  • All trials must register on ClinicalTrials.gov under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 2007)
← Back to Insights
Dermatology Last Reviewed: May 2026 CM-INS-041 // MARCH 2026

Psoriasis Clinical Trials 2026: IL-17, IL-23 Biologics & Oral Treatments

No inflammatory disease has seen a more systematic dismantling of its pathophysiology over the past two decades than plaque psoriasis. First we learned that TNF drove the inflammation. Then IL-17A. Then IL-17F. Then IL-23. Each target proved more proximal to the actual keratinocyte pathology, and each class of drug was measurably better than the last. The question in 2026 is no longer whether biologics work — PASI 100 (complete skin clearance) is achievable in the majority of patients on the best agents — it's which sequence of treatments is optimal, whether remission is achievable without ongoing therapy, and whether a once-daily oral pill can match what quarterly injections deliver.

Medical Notice

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility and availability vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any medical decisions or considering participation in a clinical trial.

Summary

Psoriasis biologics have made PASI 90 — near-complete skin clearance — achievable in the majority of moderate-to-severe patients, a benchmark that was inconceivable in the methotrexate era. Bimekizumab (dual IL-17A/F blockade) and the IL-23p19 inhibitors risankizumab and guselkumab are now the efficacy leaders. Deucravacitinib, an oral TYK2 inhibitor with a clean safety profile and no JAK-class cardiovascular warnings, is redefining what's possible without injections. Current trials are asking the harder questions: can biologics be stopped after deep remission, which patients respond to which agents based on genotype, and whether dual cytokine blockade improves outcomes further.

ClinicalMetric Analysis

  • Bimekizumab's 19% oral candidiasis rate is a predictable, mechanism-based consequence of IL-17F blockade — not a safety signal to be managed by switching drugs, but one to be managed proactively at prescription. IL-17F is a primary component of mucosal host defense specifically against Candida. Blocking it reliably increases oral Candida colonization in a subset of patients. Patients with prior recurrent oral candidiasis, partial dentures (higher baseline Candida burden), or diabetes (altered mucosal immunity) are at substantially higher risk. Proactive antifungal prophylaxis (nystatin rinse or fluconazole pulse dosing) before starting bimekizumab, rather than reactive treatment after first episode, is the appropriate prescribing approach for high-risk patients.
  • Biologic treatment withdrawal trials in psoriasis are the most clinically consequential and financially impactful research the field is running — and most prescribers aren't discussing the results with patients on long-term therapy. GUIDE (guselkumab) and IMMhance (risankizumab) show 40–60% of patients maintaining deep remission (IGA 0/1) one year after treatment withdrawal when they achieved PASI 100 on therapy. A patient on $25,000/year guselkumab who has maintained PASI 100 for 2 years is a candidate for a structured withdrawal trial — either in a research setting or an individualized clinical discussion about supervised dose spacing. This conversation isn't happening at the scale that the evidence supports.
  • Psoriatic arthritis affects ~30% of plaque psoriasis patients and may be progressing subclinically while skin is well-controlled — and the biologic choice in skin-dominant disease should account for joint risk. GRAPPA treat-to-target guidelines recommend systematic PsA screening at every dermatology visit, not just when joint symptoms are volunteered. IL-17A/F inhibitors (bimekizumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab) and IL-23 inhibitors with strong joint evidence (guselkumab Phase 3 DISCOVER, risankizumab KEEPsAKE) should be preferentially chosen in patients with any joint symptoms over agents with weaker musculoskeletal data. Treating skin alone while ignoring the 30% joint comorbidity risk is treating part of the disease.

Bimekizumab: Why Blocking Both IL-17A and IL-17F Matters

Secukinumab (Cosentyx) and ixekizumab (Taltz) established anti-IL-17A blockade as the gold standard for plaque psoriasis, delivering PASI 90 in 59–68% of patients at 16 weeks — a major step up from TNF inhibitors. But a biologically important observation emerged: IL-17F, the other predominant IL-17 isoform, also drives keratinocyte proliferation and neutrophil recruitment, and it's present at roughly equal concentrations to IL-17A in psoriatic plaques. Blocking only IL-17A leaves that second driver intact.

Bimekizumab (Bimzelx, UCB) was specifically designed to address this. The Phase 3 BE VIVID (NCT03370133), BE READY (NCT03410499), and BE SURE (NCT03412747) trials enrolled over 3,000 patients collectively and showed bimekizumab achieved PASI 90 in 85–91% and PASI 100 in 60–68% — dramatically outperforming secukinumab in direct comparisons within BE SURE (PASI 100: 61% vs. 49%). FDA approval came in October 2023. The main cost is oral candidiasis, which occurs in approximately 19% of patients; this reflects IL-17F's normal role in mucosal host defense and is typically mild and manageable. Current recruiting trials are evaluating bimekizumab for psoriatic arthritis (the BE OPTIMAL trial, which also showed strong joint outcomes), for patients who have failed prior IL-17A inhibitors, and for long-term durability after treatment withdrawal.

IL-23 Inhibitors: Upstream Targeting and Quarterly Dosing

IL-23p19 inhibitors work one step upstream of IL-17: they block the cytokine that drives Th17 cell differentiation into IL-17-producing cells in the first place. This upstream mechanism has a practical consequence that matters a lot to patients — because you're interrupting the instructional signal rather than mopping up the downstream product, the drugs work durably on infrequent dosing schedules.

Risankizumab (Skyrizi, AbbVie) achieved PASI 90 in 75% of patients at 16 weeks in the UltIMMa-1 (NCT02684370) and UltIMMa-2 (NCT02684357) trials, with PASI 90 maintained in 82% at week 52 — more durable than ustekinumab comparators. After the induction phase, dosing drops to every 12 weeks, meaning just four injections per year for maintenance. AbbVie has now secured approvals across psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, and trials evaluating risankizumab in additional immune conditions are ongoing.

Guselkumab (Tremfya, J&J) pioneered the selective IL-23p19 class and has demonstrated exceptional durability: PASI 90 rates of 84% at week 48 in the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials, with data supporting extended dosing intervals to every 16 weeks in confirmed deep responders. A dual-blockade trial combining guselkumab with secukinumab (ECLIPSE extension data) has produced near-universal PASI 90 rates in the combination arm, raising the mechanistic question of whether simultaneously blocking both IL-23 and IL-17 improves outcomes beyond what either achieves alone — though cost and the incremental benefit in already-high responders remain genuine barriers to this approach entering practice.

Deucravacitinib: The Oral Option That Actually Works

The history of oral psoriasis treatment is a history of modest efficacy. Methotrexate requires lab monitoring and carries hepatotoxicity risk. Apremilast (a PDE4 inhibitor) achieves PASI 75 in about 35–40% of patients — useful, but well below biologic benchmarks. JAK inhibitors are efficacious but carry an FDA boxed warning for cardiovascular events, VTE, and malignancy that has dampened enthusiasm. Deucravacitinib (Sotyktu, Bristol Myers Squibb) changes this calculus.

Deucravacitinib is a selective TYK2 inhibitor that works through an unusual mechanism: rather than blocking TYK2's active catalytic site (which is homologous to JAK1/2/3 and produces cross-reactivity), it binds the regulatory pseudokinase domain — a unique allosteric pocket not shared by the JAK kinases. This explains both its selectivity and its cleaner safety profile. TYK2 transmits signaling from IL-12, IL-23, and type I interferons — all psoriasis-relevant pathways — without affecting JAK1/2/3-dependent pathways involved in erythropoiesis and immune surveillance.

The POETYK PSO-1 (NCT03624127) and POETYK PSO-2 (NCT03611751) Phase 3 trials enrolled over 1,600 patients each and compared deucravacitinib to both placebo and apremilast. Results: PASI 75 in 53–58% for deucravacitinib vs. 35–40% for apremilast and 9% for placebo. The PASI 90 comparison was more striking — 28–34% vs. 10–12% for apremilast — meaning deucravacitinib approximately tripled the rate of near-complete skin clearance compared to the prior oral standard. There are no cardiovascular warnings, no mandatory lab monitoring, and no dose titration. It's once-daily oral from the first day. For patients who refuse injectable therapy or who have access barriers to infusion-based biologics, this is a genuinely meaningful advance.

BMS is currently running deucravacitinib Phase 3 trials in psoriatic arthritis (POETYK PsA, NCT04908111), systemic lupus erythematosus, and inflammatory bowel disease. If the psoriatic arthritis data holds, deucravacitinib could become the first oral agent that addresses both the skin and joint manifestations of psoriatic disease at biologic-competitive efficacy levels.

Difficult-to-Treat Locations and the New Topicals

Percent body surface area involvement is a poor proxy for quality-of-life burden in psoriasis. A patient with 4% BSA but involvement of the scalp, nails, palms, soles, and genital skin can be far more functionally impaired than someone with 15% BSA on the trunk. Clinical trials are increasingly designed to specifically evaluate these difficult-to-treat areas, and the regulatory agencies are paying attention — FDA guidance now encourages trials to include dedicated endpoints for scalp, nail, palmoplantar, and genital disease.

Tapinarof (Vtama, Dermavant) is the most mechanistically novel topical to reach patients in decades. It's an aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonist — a transcription factor pathway that normalizes keratinocyte differentiation and suppresses inflammatory cytokine production, including IL-17 and IL-22, through a mechanism entirely different from corticosteroids or calcineurin inhibitors. FDA approved in May 2022 for plaque psoriasis in adults. Phase 3 trials showed PASI 75 in approximately 36% at week 12 with once-daily application, with a meaningful proportion achieving clear or almost clear skin. The drug is approved for use on any body surface including sensitive areas where steroids are problematic.

Roflumilast cream (Zoryve, Arcutis) is a topical PDE4 inhibitor approved in 2022 for body plaque psoriasis and in 2023 for scalp psoriasis in a foam formulation. Phase 3 data showed 28–42% of patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment 0/1 (clear or almost clear) at week 8 — competitive with mid-potency topical steroids without the atrophic side effects, making it viable for long-term use on face, skin folds, and genital skin. Trials of higher-concentration roflumilast foam for intertriginous and genital psoriasis are ongoing, addressing exactly the areas where patients have historically had the fewest safe long-term options.

Key Takeaways

  • Bimekizumab (dual IL-17A/F blockade) achieves PASI 100 in 60–68% of patients — complete skin clearance in the majority — based on BE VIVID/BE READY/BE SURE Phase 3 data.
  • IL-23p19 inhibitors (risankizumab, guselkumab) deliver durable PASI 90 on quarterly dosing — four injections per year — with responses that hold through 52 weeks better than any prior biologic class.
  • Deucravacitinib (POETYK PSO-1/PSO-2) outperforms apremilast with ~3x higher PASI 90 rates, no JAK-class cardiovascular warning, no lab monitoring, and once-daily oral dosing — the first oral agent that genuinely competes with biologics in a meaningful subset of patients.
  • Tapinarof (AhR agonist) and roflumilast cream (PDE4 inhibitor) offer novel topical mechanisms for difficult-to-treat areas — scalp, nails, genitalia — where long-term steroid use is problematic.
  • Active recruiting trials are evaluating bimekizumab and deucravacitinib for psoriatic arthritis (BE OPTIMAL, POETYK PsA), testing biologic withdrawal strategies for deep remitters, and exploring dual IL-23+IL-17 blockade for biologic-refractory disease.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I join a psoriasis trial if I've failed biologics?

Yes — many psoriasis trials specifically enroll biologic-experienced patients. Prior biologic failure (anti-TNF, anti-IL-17, anti-IL-23) is often a stratification factor rather than an exclusion criterion. Second-line and combination trials explicitly target patients who haven't achieved adequate response on current treatments. The key eligibility factors are which biologics you've failed (some trials require failure of specific classes), washout periods (typically 4–12 weeks depending on the agent), and BSA/PASI score at screening confirming still-active disease. Documenting prior treatment history with dates, doses, and reason for discontinuation before screening is essential.

What PASI score is needed to enroll in a psoriasis trial?

Most moderate-to-severe psoriasis trials require a PASI score of ≥12 at baseline, BSA ≥10%, and IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment) of 3 or higher (moderate). These thresholds are used to confirm active, inadequately controlled disease — patients with well-controlled psoriasis (PASI <10) would not be eligible for most treatment trials. Some trials require washout from current treatments to allow disease to return to sufficient severity before screening — this can mean temporary worsening before enrollment, which should be factored into the decision to pursue a trial.

What are the most effective psoriasis treatments currently in trials?

The IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitor classes produce the highest PASI response rates of any currently approved treatments — PASI 90 responses of 60–80% and PASI 100 (complete clearance) of 30–50% are now achievable. Bimekizumab (Bimzelx), the first dual IL-17A/F inhibitor, showed PASI 100 rates of 48–61% in Phase 3, higher than single-target IL-17 inhibitors. Pipeline agents include next-generation IL-23 inhibitors with extended dosing intervals and TYK2 inhibitors (deucravacitinib already approved) for patients seeking oral options. Trials investigating combination IL-17 + IL-23 blockade for ultra-refractory disease are in early phases.

Does psoriatic arthritis affect trial eligibility?

Approximately 30% of psoriasis patients develop psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Many plaque psoriasis trials exclude patients with active PsA because it complicates endpoint interpretation and requires different safety monitoring. Conversely, PsA-specific trials address both skin and joint disease. If you have both conditions, trials designed for PsA — which use ACR response criteria alongside PASI — may be more appropriate than skin-only trials. Some newer trials, particularly those testing IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors, include patients with both conditions if the PsA is stable, since these agents are approved for both indications.

◆ Primary Sources & Further Reading
ClinicalTrials.gov — Recruiting Psoriasis Trials NIAMS — Psoriasis Research

Related Articles

Condition Guide
Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials 2026
Condition Guide
Lupus Clinical Trials 2026
Patient Guide
Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria
EK
◆ Founder & Platform Director
Efi Kara
Electrical & Computer Engineer · 30 years IT management · responsible for platform implementation, editorial direction, and growth strategy.
◆ Research & Analysis
IA
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
Clinical Research Analyst & ISO Inspector

B.Sc. Agricultural Sciences. ISO inspector and compliance auditor. Researches and writes ClinicalMetric Insights using primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EudraCT, PubMed.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-03-15
◆ Medical Review
GA
Georgios Anagas
Medical Content Reviewer

Physiotherapy student. Reviews Insights articles for medical accuracy and patient relevance — condition descriptions, eligibility language, and treatment context for patients and caregivers.

⚕️ Patient-facing medical accuracy review
◆ Technical Review
AA
Achi Anagas
Platform & Data Infrastructure Lead

B.Sc. Informatics & Communications (in progress). Responsible for ClinicalMetric's technical architecture, API integrations with ClinicalTrials.gov, and data accuracy verification.

🔄 Trial data updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Editorial & Research Standards
Stage 1 — Primary Research
ClinicalTrials.gov registry data (NIH/NLM), FDA documentation, EudraCT, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, eligibility, and enrollment data verified at source.
Stage 2 — Medical Accuracy Review
Cross-checked against PubMed/MEDLINE literature and FDA/EMA communications. Eligibility criteria and patient safety information verified for accuracy.
Stage 3 — Registry Verification
Phase classification, enrollment status, sponsor identity, and trial location cross-referenced against official registry records before publication.
⚕️ Medical Disclaimer: ClinicalMetric provides research intelligence only. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making clinical decisions or participating in a trial.
Publisher
ClinicalMetric
Independent Clinical Trial Intelligence
Tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide. Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA IND registry, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register).
Research Methodology
Articles are researched from primary registry sources: ClinicalTrials.gov XML feeds, FDA trial databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, enrollment, and eligibility data is sourced directly from registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.
Primary Data Sources
Accuracy & Updates
Trial status, enrollment, and eligibility information changes frequently. ClinicalMetric syncs with ClinicalTrials.gov daily. Editorial articles are reviewed quarterly or when major protocol amendments are published. Always verify trial status directly on ClinicalTrials.gov before making clinical decisions.
◆ Live Clinical Trial Feed
Browse 400,000+ Active Clinical Trials
Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov · Recruiting trials by condition, phase, sponsor
Search Active Trials →
About ClinicalMetric → Research Methodology → Medical Disclaimer → LinkedIn →

Browse Recruiting Clinical Trials

Find active recruiting trials on ClinicalMetric — updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Browse by Condition →Phase 3 TrialsAll Recruiting Trials

Editorial Notice: This article was reviewed by the ClinicalMetric editorial team. Clinical trial data changes frequently as trials progress, enroll, or close. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. To report an inaccuracy, contact dev@clinicalmetric.com.

◆ Related Research Guides
Trial DesignAdaptive Clinical Trial Design 2026: Seamless Phases, Response-Adaptive Randomization, and Platform TrialsRead guide →Data ScienceAI in Clinical Data Management 2026: EDC, Risk-Based Monitoring, and eTMF AutomationRead guide →PulmonologyAsthma Clinical Trials 2026: Biologics for Severe Asthma & New TreatmentsRead guide →CardiologyAtrial Fibrillation Clinical Trials 2026: New Ablation Techniques, Anticoagulants & Reversal AgentsRead guide →
ClinicalMetric Intelligence Team
Clinical Trial Research & Analysis · Last updated April 2026
Analysis compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA trial registry data, and peer-reviewed clinical research. ClinicalMetric tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide, updated daily from the ClinicalTrials.gov AACT database.
Get Weekly Clinical Trial Alerts
New recruiting trials from NIH, NCI, and 40+ sponsors — every Monday. Free forever.
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence at a Glance
400K+
Active trials tracked
200+
Countries with active trials
4
Clinical trial phases
Daily
Data refresh from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Clinical Trial Phase Transition Success Rates
Phase 1 → Phase 2 success ~63%
Phase 2 → Phase 3 success ~32%
Phase 3 → Approval ~58%
Overall FDA approval rate ~12%
Source: Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) Clinical Development Success Rates — approximate industry averages.
◆ Clinical Trial Development Timeline
Mo 1–6
Preclinical + IND Filing
Mo 6–18
Phase 1 (Safety)
Mo 18–48
Phase 2 (Efficacy)
Mo 48–84
Phase 3 (Pivotal)
Mo 84–96
FDA Review / NDA
Mo 96+
Approval + Phase 4
Timeline is approximate. Total development from preclinical to approval averages 6–13 years.
About the Author
ClinicalMetric Research Team
Clinical Trial Intelligence Specialists · clinicalmetric.com
Our analysts monitor 400,000+ clinical trials daily across oncology, neurology, cardiology, and rare diseases. All data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA.gov.
🔬 400K+ trials tracked 🌍 200+ countries 🔄 Updated: June 2026
◆ Common Questions About Clinical Trials
What is a clinical trial? +
A clinical trial is a research study involving human participants designed to evaluate medical interventions — such as drugs, devices, or behavioral strategies. Trials follow a structured protocol and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. They progress through phases: Phase 1 (safety), Phase 2 (efficacy), Phase 3 (large-scale comparison), and Phase 4 (post-market surveillance).
How do I find clinical trials I'm eligible for? +
You can search ClinicalTrials.gov or use ClinicalMetric to filter by condition, phase, or location. Each trial listing includes eligibility criteria such as age range, sex, diagnosis, and prior treatment history. Contact the study team directly or ask your physician to refer you to a relevant trial.
Are clinical trials safe to participate in? +
Clinical trials are conducted under strict ethical and regulatory oversight, including IRB approval and FDA regulation in the US. All participants must give informed consent after reviewing potential risks and benefits. Phase 1 trials carry more uncertainty, while Phase 3 trials involve interventions with an established safety profile. Participation is always voluntary and you may withdraw at any time.
What are the phases of clinical trials? +
Clinical trials progress through four main phases. Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group (20–80 people). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects in a larger group (100–300). Phase 3 compares the intervention against standard treatments in thousands of participants. Phase 4 occurs after approval and monitors long-term effects in the general population.
Do participants get paid for joining clinical trials? +
Many clinical trials offer compensation for time and travel expenses, though payment structures vary widely by study. Compensation is not intended to be coercive. Some trials also cover treatment costs for participants. Always review the consent form carefully and ask the study coordinator about any financial considerations before enrolling.
Browse by Phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4
Browse by Condition
CancerDiabetesAlzheimer'sDepressionHeart DiseaseCOVID-19Parkinson'sMultiple Sclerosis
ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology