ClinicalMetric Research Team · Last Reviewed: June 2026 · Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA · NIH
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence — Key Facts
  • 400,000+ active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov across 200+ countries (2025)
  • Only ~12% of drugs entering clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval
  • Average clinical trial takes 6–13 years from Phase 1 to regulatory approval
  • ~40% of trials fail to recruit sufficient participants — the #1 reason trials stop early
  • All trials must register on ClinicalTrials.gov under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 2007)
← Back to Insights
Oncology // 2026 Last Reviewed: May 2026 CM-INS-072 // MARCH 2026

Pancreatic Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: KRAS Inhibitors, Immunotherapy, and New Treatments

Pancreatic cancer's 5-year survival has barely moved in decades — currently around 13% for all stages combined, primarily because over 80% of cases are diagnosed when surgical resection is no longer possible. The field spent 30 years watching every new approach fail: immunotherapy, antifibrotic agents, nab-paclitaxel combinations that improved median survival by weeks, not years. What's genuinely different in 2026 is KRAS. KRAS G12D — present in approximately 40% of pancreatic adenocarcinomas — was undruggable until recently. The KRAS G12C inhibitor story in lung cancer proved the target was druggable; the pancreatic cancer field waited for the chemistry to catch up on G12D. It has. Whether KRAS G12D inhibitors change survival outcomes remains to be demonstrated in Phase 3, but the Phase 1/2 signals are the most credible early efficacy data pancreatic oncology has seen in a long time.

Medical Notice

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility and availability vary. Always consult a qualified oncologist before making any treatment decisions or considering participation in a clinical trial.

Summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of oncology's most difficult challenges — 5-year survival of ~13% for all stages combined, third leading cause of US cancer death. The 2026 trial landscape is more substantive than any prior year: MRTX1133 and other KRAS G12D inhibitors are in Phase 1/2 with early activity signals in PDAC (NCT05737706); Moderna/Merck's mRNA-4157 personalized vaccine is in Phase 2 adjuvant PDAC (following the 44% recurrence risk reduction in resected melanoma); NALIRIFOX is now standard first-line metastatic therapy and being combined with immunotherapy; and liquid biopsy early detection trials are validating whether ctDNA-based approaches can shift diagnosis to earlier, operable stages. Patients should prioritize comprehensive molecular profiling — KRAS subtype, BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, MSI status — as the prerequisite for understanding their trial options.

ClinicalMetric Analysis

  • KRAS G12D required a fundamentally different chemical approach than G12C — which is why the pancreatic KRAS program is years behind lung cancer. KRAS G12C can be covalently inhibited because cysteine has a reactive thiol group. G12D replaces cysteine with aspartate — no reactive thiol — so covalent binding is not possible. MRTX1133 and competing G12D inhibitors use non-covalent mechanisms with shorter target residence times and higher susceptibility to GTP competition. Pancreatic cancer's very high KRAS mutant allele frequency means the drug must suppress an abundant oncogenic driver without the irreversibility advantage that made sotorasib and adagrasib tractable. Phase 1/2 ORRs of 20–30% would represent clinically meaningful advance in a disease where most single agents show under 10%.
  • The desmoplastic stroma is both a physical barrier and an active immunosuppressive environment — combination trials need to address both problems simultaneously. Even when checkpoint inhibitors activate T cells systemically, those cells enter a microenvironment dominated by M2 macrophages, MDSCs, TGF-beta from cancer-associated fibroblasts, and dense ECM that physically excludes effector cells. Anti-FAP ADCs target fibroblasts directly. Trials addressing only stroma (better drug delivery) or only checkpoint (better T cell activation) are testing half a solution. The PDAC immunotherapy programs most likely to succeed are the ones explicitly designed around both barrier reduction and active immunosuppression simultaneously.
  • ctDNA early detection for pancreatic cancer faces a sensitivity/specificity problem that makes population screening counterproductive — but risk-stratified screening in high-risk groups is different in kind. With 1.5% lifetime incidence in the general population, even a 99% specific test generates more false positives than true positives — leading to unnecessary imaging, anxiety, and potentially harmful workup in people without cancer. Early detection screening makes sense for high-risk populations: BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CDKN2A carriers; familial pancreatic cancer clusters; new-onset diabetes with rapid weight loss after 50. DETECT-A and liquid biopsy trials are most valuable as tools for refining risk stratification and validating surveillance protocols in these specific groups — not for universal deployment.

Why Pancreatic Cancer Has Been So Hard to Treat

Three structural problems have defeated most treatment approaches for decades. First, PDAC presents late. The pancreas is retroperitoneal, symptoms are nonspecific (back pain, new-onset diabetes, weight loss), and there's no equivalent of the colonoscopy or mammogram to detect early disease in the general population. By the time most patients are diagnosed, the tumor has invaded locally or metastasized.

Second, the tumor stroma is extraordinarily dense. Pancreatic cancer is surrounded by a desmoplastic matrix of fibroblasts, collagen, and extracellular matrix components that physically limits drug delivery to tumor cells and excludes immune effector cells. Immunotherapy doesn't fail in pancreatic cancer because the immune system isn't trying — it fails because T cells can't reach the tumor.

Third, KRAS. KRAS mutations drive virtually every PDAC, and unlike in CRC or NSCLC, PDAC has no actionable minority: there's no EGFR-mutant subset, no ALK-rearranged cohort for which a targeted drug exists. Until KRAS itself became targetable, the entire tumor genetics of pancreatic cancer offered no precision medicine entry point.

KRAS G12D Inhibitors: Where the Phase 1/2 Evidence Stands

MRTX1133 (now being developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb following Mirati's acquisition) is the most advanced KRAS G12D-selective inhibitor in clinical development. Phase 1/2 NCT05737706 is enrolling patients with KRAS G12D-mutant solid tumors, with dedicated PDAC expansion cohorts. Early data presented at ASCO 2024 showed disease control (stable disease or partial response) in approximately 50% of evaluable PDAC patients as monotherapy — modest by many standards, but remarkable by pancreatic cancer standards where single-agent activity of any targeted drug has been essentially absent until now.

The combination strategy is probably where MRTX1133's real value will emerge. KRAS G12D inhibition combined with chemotherapy (gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel), anti-PD-1, or anti-EGFR agents is the active development path, based on preclinical evidence of synergy and on the precedent from KRAS G12C inhibitor combinations in lung cancer. The AMPLIFY study is specifically examining MRTX1133 combinations in PDAC.

Pan-KRAS inhibitors offer an important alternative for patients without G12D specifically:

  • RMC-6236 (Revolution Medicines): A RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor that targets multiple KRAS and NRAS mutations in their active (GTP-bound) state rather than a single mutation subtype. Phase 1/2 data in PDAC (NCT05379985) showed partial responses and durable stable disease in KRAS G12V, G12R, and other non-G12D mutations — covering patients excluded from G12D-selective trials.
  • HRS-4642 (Heurigen, Phase 1): Oral KRAS G12D inhibitor with pancreatic cancer expansion cohorts; combination planning with gemcitabine scheduled for 2026 portion of the trial.

mRNA Personalized Cancer Vaccines: Phase 2 in PDAC

Moderna/Merck's mRNA-4157/V940 vaccine sequences each patient's tumor, identifies up to 34 patient-specific neoantigens, and manufactures a custom mRNA vaccine encoding those neoantigens — a process taking approximately 6–8 weeks. The treatment rationale is that pancreatic cancers, despite their low mutational burden, do present patient-specific neoantigens that an appropriately primed immune system can recognize.

The evidence base comes from two directions. In resected melanoma, KEYNOTE-942 showed mRNA-4157 + pembrolizumab reduced recurrence risk by 44% (HR 0.56) vs. pembrolizumab alone — a result robust enough to trigger FDA Breakthrough Therapy designation and Phase 3 initiation across multiple tumor types. In PDAC specifically, BioNTech's BNT122 (autogene cevumeran) Phase 2 IMCODE003 data showed that vaccine-induced neoantigen-specific T-cell responses predicted significantly longer recurrence-free survival in resected PDAC patients — HR 0.08 for responders vs. non-responders, a signal that drove Phase 2 expansion.

The mRNA-4157 PDAC program is evaluating the vaccine in the adjuvant setting (after surgical resection) combined with pembrolizumab and mFOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. The rationale for adjuvant timing: tumor tissue is available for sequencing, residual micrometastatic disease may be more vulnerable to immune surveillance, and the patient's immune system hasn't been compromised by extensive prior treatment. Enrollment requires sufficient tumor tissue from surgery — patients undergoing resection at participating NCI-designated cancer centers should ask about eligibility at the time of surgery planning.

CAR-T and Cellular Therapies: Early-Stage but Notable Progress

CAR-T has transformed blood cancers and faces a different problem in solid tumors: not target availability (mesothelin is highly expressed on PDAC cells and is a well-validated CAR-T target) but T-cell trafficking and persistence. The dense desmoplastic stroma physically blocks T-cell infiltration, and the immunosuppressive cytokine environment (TGF-beta, IL-10, VEGF) exhausts T cells that do penetrate.

The 2026 trials address this problem through engineering:

  • Armored anti-mesothelin CAR-T: T cells engineered to secrete IL-15 or IL-21 within the tumor microenvironment to maintain their own survival and function despite immunosuppressive signals. Phase 1 trials ongoing at Memorial Sloan Kettering and MD Anderson.
  • Anti-mesothelin CAR-T + checkpoint inhibitor: Combining T-cell delivery with anti-PD-1 to reduce exhaustion. Phase 1 data shows feasibility of manufacturing and infusion; tumor infiltration is being assessed by biopsy.
  • TIL (Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte) therapy: Lifileucel (Amtagvi), FDA-approved for melanoma in 2024, is being evaluated in PDAC. PDAC TIL expansion protocols are technically feasible but clinically complex given the immune-cold tumor microenvironment.

Chemotherapy Combinations and Standard-of-Care Backbone Trials

NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan + oxaliplatin + fluorouracil + leucovorin) was FDA-approved in 2023 as first-line therapy for metastatic PDAC based on NAPOLI-3 showing median OS 11.1 months vs. 9.2 months with gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (HR 0.83). NALIRIFOX is now the comparator arm in several 2026 combination trials, including with anti-PD-1 (AMPLIFY-201) and with KRAS-targeted agents.

For the ~5–7% of PDAC patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations, olaparib maintenance after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is standard based on POLO trial data (median PFS 7.4 vs. 3.8 months, HR 0.53). Phase 2 trials are now combining olaparib with ATR inhibitors (ceralasertib) in BRCA-mutant PDAC to address acquired PARP inhibitor resistance, which develops rapidly in this setting.

Early Detection Trials: The Highest-Value Intervention

The single intervention with the most potential to change pancreatic cancer mortality is earlier diagnosis. At Stage IA (tumor confined to pancreas, ≤2 cm), 5-year survival is approximately 80%. At Stage IV (metastatic), it's approximately 3%. The challenge is detecting Stage IA — currently these tumors are almost exclusively found incidentally during imaging for other reasons.

  • High-risk individual surveillance: CAPS (Cancer of the Pancreas Screening) consortium multi-center studies are tracking EUS and MRI/MRCP surveillance in individuals with BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, or CDKN2A mutations, or with familial pancreatic cancer (≥2 first-degree relatives). These observational studies are validating detection protocols, not testing drugs — but they represent the pathway to population screening programs.
  • Liquid biopsy validation: The GRAIL Galleri multi-cancer early detection test is being validated in prospective trials including the NHS-Galleri study (140,000 UK participants). Pancreatic cancer is one of GRAIL's strongest ctDNA signals — PDAC sheds characteristic methylation patterns detectable in blood before clinical symptoms. Whether the sensitivity and specificity are sufficient for population screening at acceptable positive predictive value is what these trials determine.
  • New-onset diabetes as a trigger: Approximately 50% of PDAC patients develop new-onset diabetes 6–36 months before cancer diagnosis (likely due to tumor-induced beta-cell dysfunction). CA19-9 measurement in patients with new-onset diabetes over 50 is being evaluated as a low-cost screening strategy that could identify PDAC before imaging-detectable disease.

How to Find Pancreatic Cancer Trials in 2026

  • Get comprehensive molecular profiling first: Foundation One CDx or equivalent — confirming KRAS G12D vs. other KRAS subtypes, BRCA1/2, PALB2, ATM, NTRK fusions, MSI/TMB, and HER2. This is the prerequisite for meaningful trial matching. Many KRAS G12D inhibitor trials require confirmed G12D subtype — not just "KRAS mutant."
  • Contact PanCAN Patient Services: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network maintains the most comprehensive database of PDAC trials with direct coordinator relationships. Their patient services team provides free, personalized trial matching and can identify studies not yet widely publicized. pancan.org/clinical-trials.
  • Seek consultation at an NCI-designated cancer center: Even if you receive primary care elsewhere, a consultation at an NCI-designated center (MD Anderson, Memorial Sloan Kettering, Johns Hopkins, Dana-Farber, UCSF) provides access to the most trials and the most experienced trial coordinators for PDAC-specific studies.
  • Search ClinicalTrials.gov: Search "pancreatic cancer" + "recruiting" and filter by phase. Review the eligibility criteria for KRAS subtype requirements — not all PDAC trials accept all KRAS mutations.
End of Guide // ClinicalMetric Intelligence — CM-INS-072

Frequently Asked Questions

What pancreatic cancer treatments are in clinical trials in 2026?

Key approaches: KRAS G12D inhibitors (first-in-class, showing early responses); mRNA cancer vaccines (personalized neoantigen vaccines); PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2-mutant pancreatic cancer; antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting mesothelin and HER2; and CAR-T cell therapies. Immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy backbone remain active.

Is there genetic testing I should do before joining a trial?

Yes. Molecular profiling is now standard before trial enrollment. Request comprehensive genomic profiling to identify: BRCA1/2 mutations (PARP inhibitor eligible), KRAS mutation status, NTRK fusions, MSI-H/dMMR (immunotherapy eligible), and FGFR alterations. Germline testing also informs family risk.

Can I join a pancreatic cancer trial while on chemotherapy?

Some trials enroll patients currently on chemotherapy (combination trials), while others require washout periods of 2-4 weeks after prior treatment. Maintenance trials enroll patients after completing first-line chemotherapy. Your oncologist will determine which trials fit your current treatment phase.

◆ Primary Sources & Further Reading
ClinicalTrials.gov — Recruiting Pancreatic Cancer Trials NCI — Pancreatic Cancer Research Pancreatic Cancer Action Network — Trial Finder

Related Articles

Oncology
Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: A Complete Guide to Oncology Research and Patient Enrollment
READ ANALYSIS →
Precision Medicine
Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials: Personalized Medicine in 2026
READ ANALYSIS →
Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy Combination Trials 2026: Checkpoint Inhibitors and Beyond
READ ANALYSIS →
EK
◆ Founder & Platform Director
Efi Kara
Electrical & Computer Engineer · 30 years IT management · responsible for platform implementation, editorial direction, and growth strategy.
◆ Research & Analysis
IA
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
Clinical Research Analyst & ISO Inspector

B.Sc. Agricultural Sciences. ISO inspector and compliance auditor. Researches and writes ClinicalMetric Insights using primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EudraCT, PubMed.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-03-22
◆ Medical Review
GA
Georgios Anagas
Medical Content Reviewer

Physiotherapy student. Reviews Insights articles for medical accuracy and patient relevance — condition descriptions, eligibility language, and treatment context for patients and caregivers.

⚕️ Patient-facing medical accuracy review
◆ Technical Review
AA
Achi Anagas
Platform & Data Infrastructure Lead

B.Sc. Informatics & Communications (in progress). Responsible for ClinicalMetric's technical architecture, API integrations with ClinicalTrials.gov, and data accuracy verification.

🔄 Trial data updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Editorial & Research Standards
Stage 1 — Primary Research
ClinicalTrials.gov registry data (NIH/NLM), FDA documentation, EudraCT, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, eligibility, and enrollment data verified at source.
Stage 2 — Medical Accuracy Review
Cross-checked against PubMed/MEDLINE literature and FDA/EMA communications. Eligibility criteria and patient safety information verified for accuracy.
Stage 3 — Registry Verification
Phase classification, enrollment status, sponsor identity, and trial location cross-referenced against official registry records before publication.
⚕️ Medical Disclaimer: ClinicalMetric provides research intelligence only. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making clinical decisions or participating in a trial.
Publisher
ClinicalMetric
Independent Clinical Trial Intelligence
Tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide. Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA IND registry, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register).
Research Methodology
Articles are researched from primary registry sources: ClinicalTrials.gov XML feeds, FDA trial databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, enrollment, and eligibility data is sourced directly from registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.
Primary Data Sources
Accuracy & Updates
Trial status, enrollment, and eligibility information changes frequently. ClinicalMetric syncs with ClinicalTrials.gov daily. Editorial articles are reviewed quarterly or when major protocol amendments are published. Always verify trial status directly on ClinicalTrials.gov before making clinical decisions.
◆ Live Clinical Trial Feed
Browse 400,000+ Active Clinical Trials
Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov · Recruiting trials by condition, phase, sponsor
Search Active Trials →
About ClinicalMetric → Research Methodology → Medical Disclaimer → LinkedIn →

Browse Recruiting Clinical Trials

Find active recruiting trials on ClinicalMetric — updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Browse by Condition →Phase 3 TrialsAll Recruiting Trials

Editorial Notice: This article was reviewed by the ClinicalMetric editorial team. Clinical trial data changes frequently as trials progress, enroll, or close. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. To report an inaccuracy, contact dev@clinicalmetric.com.

◆ Related Research Guides
OncologyAntibody-Drug Conjugates in Clinical Trials 2026: Thirteen Approvals, the Bystander Effect, and the Combination EraRead guide →Immuno-OncologyBispecific Antibodies in Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: Six Approvals, T-Cell Engagers, and the Solid Tumor QuestionRead guide →OncologyBreast Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: ADCs, Immunotherapy & Targeted TherapiesRead guide →OncologyCancer Clinical Trials 2026: Recruiting Oncology Studies — Immunotherapy, CAR-T & Targeted TherapyRead guide →
ClinicalMetric Intelligence Team
Clinical Trial Research & Analysis · Last updated April 2026
Analysis compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA trial registry data, and peer-reviewed clinical research. ClinicalMetric tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide, updated daily from the ClinicalTrials.gov AACT database.
Get Weekly Clinical Trial Alerts
New recruiting trials from NIH, NCI, and 40+ sponsors — every Monday. Free forever.
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence at a Glance
400K+
Active trials tracked
200+
Countries with active trials
4
Clinical trial phases
Daily
Data refresh from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Clinical Trial Phase Transition Success Rates
Phase 1 → Phase 2 success ~63%
Phase 2 → Phase 3 success ~32%
Phase 3 → Approval ~58%
Overall FDA approval rate ~12%
Source: Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) Clinical Development Success Rates — approximate industry averages.
◆ Clinical Trial Development Timeline
Mo 1–6
Preclinical + IND Filing
Mo 6–18
Phase 1 (Safety)
Mo 18–48
Phase 2 (Efficacy)
Mo 48–84
Phase 3 (Pivotal)
Mo 84–96
FDA Review / NDA
Mo 96+
Approval + Phase 4
Timeline is approximate. Total development from preclinical to approval averages 6–13 years.
About the Author
ClinicalMetric Research Team
Clinical Trial Intelligence Specialists · clinicalmetric.com
Our analysts monitor 400,000+ clinical trials daily across oncology, neurology, cardiology, and rare diseases. All data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA.gov.
🔬 400K+ trials tracked 🌍 200+ countries 🔄 Updated: June 2026
◆ Common Questions About Clinical Trials
What is a clinical trial? +
A clinical trial is a research study involving human participants designed to evaluate medical interventions — such as drugs, devices, or behavioral strategies. Trials follow a structured protocol and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. They progress through phases: Phase 1 (safety), Phase 2 (efficacy), Phase 3 (large-scale comparison), and Phase 4 (post-market surveillance).
How do I find clinical trials I'm eligible for? +
You can search ClinicalTrials.gov or use ClinicalMetric to filter by condition, phase, or location. Each trial listing includes eligibility criteria such as age range, sex, diagnosis, and prior treatment history. Contact the study team directly or ask your physician to refer you to a relevant trial.
Are clinical trials safe to participate in? +
Clinical trials are conducted under strict ethical and regulatory oversight, including IRB approval and FDA regulation in the US. All participants must give informed consent after reviewing potential risks and benefits. Phase 1 trials carry more uncertainty, while Phase 3 trials involve interventions with an established safety profile. Participation is always voluntary and you may withdraw at any time.
What are the phases of clinical trials? +
Clinical trials progress through four main phases. Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group (20–80 people). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects in a larger group (100–300). Phase 3 compares the intervention against standard treatments in thousands of participants. Phase 4 occurs after approval and monitors long-term effects in the general population.
Do participants get paid for joining clinical trials? +
Many clinical trials offer compensation for time and travel expenses, though payment structures vary widely by study. Compensation is not intended to be coercive. Some trials also cover treatment costs for participants. Always review the consent form carefully and ask the study coordinator about any financial considerations before enrolling.
Browse by Phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4
Browse by Condition
CancerDiabetesAlzheimer'sDepressionHeart DiseaseCOVID-19Parkinson'sMultiple Sclerosis
ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology