ClinicalMetric Research Team · Last Reviewed: June 2026 · Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA · NIH
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence — Key Facts
  • 400,000+ active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov across 200+ countries (2025)
  • Only ~12% of drugs entering clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval
  • Average clinical trial takes 6–13 years from Phase 1 to regulatory approval
  • ~40% of trials fail to recruit sufficient participants — the #1 reason trials stop early
  • All trials must register on ClinicalTrials.gov under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 2007)
← Back to Insights
Oncology Last Reviewed: May 2026 CM-INS-044 // MARCH 2026

Ovarian Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: PARP Inhibitors, ADCs & Immunotherapy

Ovarian cancer's lethality is primarily a detection problem — roughly 75% of cases are diagnosed at Stage III or IV because the disease is asymptomatic until it has spread beyond the ovary, and no effective screening test exists for the general population. The PARP inhibitor approvals transformed the maintenance therapy landscape for BRCA-mutated and HRD-positive patients: olaparib maintenance after first-line chemotherapy extends progression-free survival by years, not months. But that benefit concentrates heavily in the ~20% of patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. The 2026 trial agenda is about what comes next — overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance, extending the benefit to HRD-negative patients, and validating mirvetuximab soravtansine's survival benefit across earlier lines of therapy.

Medical Notice

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility and availability vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any medical decisions or considering participation in a clinical trial.

Summary

Ovarian cancer is diagnosed in approximately 20,000 women annually in the US with a 5-year overall survival around 49% — primarily because over 75% of cases present at advanced stage. PARP inhibitor maintenance has substantially extended PFS in BRCA-mutated and HRD-positive high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Mirvetuximab soravtansine (Elahere) became the first drug in years to show an overall survival benefit in platinum-resistant disease, with a 35% reduction in risk of death (OS HR 0.67) in the MIRASOL Phase 3 trial. In 2026, trials are targeting PARP resistance mechanisms, extending mirvetuximab to platinum-sensitive settings, and systematically evaluating the combination strategies needed to activate immunotherapy responses in a tumor type that has so far been largely resistant to checkpoint blockade.

ClinicalMetric Analysis

  • BRCA reversion mutation detection via liquid biopsy during PARP inhibitor maintenance is clinically actionable — and earlier switch to ATR or WEE1 inhibitors before radiographic progression may improve subsequent response rates. Acquired resistance through BRCA reversion mutation restores functional HR repair and renders PARP inhibitors ineffective, but this happens at the molecular level before imaging shows progression. Serial ctDNA monitoring detecting reversion mutations during maintenance creates an opportunity to switch to mechanistically appropriate alternatives (ATR inhibitors for reversion-mediated resistance, ADCs for non-HR-mediated resistance) at a lower tumor burden. Centers with liquid biopsy capability should consider serial monitoring as a standard component of PARP inhibitor maintenance management rather than an investigational tool.
  • Mirvetuximab soravtansine's OS benefit requires FRα testing that many community oncologists still aren't routinely ordering — patients diagnosed today may be unaware they should ask for it. MIRASOL enrolled patients with FRα-high expression (≥75% of cells at 2+ intensity by immunohistochemistry), and the OS HR of 0.67 applies to that specifically defined population. Patients with ovarian cancer who haven't had FRα testing on their archival tumor tissue may be unknowingly ineligible for the most effective approved second-line option in platinum-resistant disease. Every patient diagnosed with ovarian cancer should proactively ask about FRα testing at initial molecular profiling — even if they're currently being treated for platinum-sensitive disease, because the result will determine eligibility later.
  • HRD testing beyond BRCA1/2 identifies an additional 20–25% of PARP inhibitor-eligible patients who are missed by germline BRCA testing alone. Genomic instability scores (Myriad myChoice CDx, FoundationOne CDx) detect HRD signatures — loss of heterozygosity, telomeric allelic imbalance, large-scale state transitions — in patients without BRCA mutations. PRIMA and PAOLA-1 established PARP inhibitor maintenance benefit in HRD-positive/BRCA-wild-type patients. Testing only germline BRCA without an HRD assay at diagnosis is an incomplete molecular workup for HGSOC. The test should be performed on tumor tissue (somatic HRD), not just blood (germline BRCA), to capture the full eligible population.

PARP Inhibitors: What the Data Shows and Where the Resistance Problem Sits

PARP inhibitors exploit synthetic lethality in homologous recombination-deficient (HRD) tumors. When BRCA1/2 mutations prevent HR-mediated DNA repair, cells become exquisitely dependent on PARP-mediated base excision repair. PARP inhibitors trap PARP proteins on damaged DNA, causing stalled replication forks and cell death specifically in HRD cells — a mechanism that leaves HR-proficient normal cells relatively unaffected.

The first-line maintenance trial data is robust. SOLO-1 (olaparib after first-line platinum in BRCA-mutant HGSOC) showed a 70% reduction in risk of disease progression or death (HR 0.30) at 2 years, with 7-year follow-up confirming sustained benefit — 46.8% of olaparib patients vs. 19.4% of placebo patients remained progression-free. PRIMA (niraparib after first-line platinum in HRD-positive population) showed HR 0.43 for PFS in the HRD-positive/BRCA-mutant subgroup. BRCA1/2-mutated patients derive the largest benefit, but HRD-positive/BRCA-wild-type patients also show meaningful improvement.

The resistance problem is where the 2026 trials concentrate. Acquired PARP inhibitor resistance typically develops through restoration of homologous recombination — BRCA reversion mutations that restore functional protein, loss of 53BP1 reducing end-joining and restoring HR, or drug efflux pump upregulation (MDR1/ABCB1). Several mechanisms are targetable:

  • ATR inhibition combinations: Ceralasertib (AstraZeneca) and berzosertib (M6620) inhibit ATR kinase, which is required for replication fork stability when HR is impaired. PARP + ATR inhibitor combinations are in Phase 2 for PARPi-resistant HGSOC — the hypothesis being that ATR inhibition re-sensitizes cells that have restored partial HR. ORCA trial data is being analyzed.
  • WEE1 inhibition: Adavosertib (AZD1775) inhibits WEE1 kinase, forcing premature mitotic entry in cells with DNA damage — synthetic lethality in HRD tumors. Phase 2 trials ongoing in PARPi-resistant settings.
  • PARPi rechallenge: Whether patients who responded to first-line PARPi maintenance and progressed can benefit from a second PARPi course (potentially a different agent or after a treatment break) is being systematically evaluated. The OREO trial addresses rechallenge with olaparib vs. placebo after a treatment-free interval.

Mirvetuximab Soravtansine: What the MIRASOL Data Actually Means

Mirvetuximab soravtansine (Elahere, ImmunoGen/AbbVie) is an antibody-drug conjugate targeting folate receptor alpha (FRα), which is overexpressed in approximately 35–40% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers. The antibody (mirvetuximab) delivers a maytansinoid cytotoxin (DM4) directly to FRα-expressing cells with a cleavable linker that also allows bystander killing of adjacent FRα-negative cells that have taken up released drug from dying neighbors.

MIRASOL (NCT04209855), the Phase 3 randomized trial in platinum-resistant HGSOC with high FRα expression, compared mirvetuximab monotherapy vs. investigator's choice chemotherapy (paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan). Results: median PFS 5.62 vs. 3.98 months (HR 0.65, p<0.0001); median OS 16.46 vs. 12.75 months (HR 0.67, p=0.0046). This was the first randomized trial to demonstrate an overall survival benefit in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in over a decade. FDA granted full approval in March 2024.

The 2026 trials expand mirvetuximab's use into platinum-sensitive settings where the benefit might be larger:

  • GLORIOSA (NCT04672448): Mirvetuximab + bevacizumab as maintenance after response to platinum-based chemotherapy in FRα-high, platinum-sensitive relapsed disease. Phase 3, actively recruiting.
  • PICCOLO (NCT05041257): Mirvetuximab + carboplatin in FRα-high platinum-sensitive relapsed HGSOC. Testing whether the ADC adds to standard platinum re-treatment.

The FRα testing requirement is important clinically. Not all ovarian cancer patients express FRα at the high level required for MIRASOL eligibility (≥75% of tumor cells at 2+ intensity). Patients and oncologists need to confirm FRα expression status — using the VENTANA FOLR1 (FOLR1-2.1) RxDx assay — before determining mirvetuximab eligibility. This is a companion diagnostic, not a standard pathology test.

Emerging ADC Targets: Broader Population Coverage

The MIRASOL success has accelerated ADC development across alternative targets that cover larger fractions of the ovarian cancer population:

Upifitamab rilsodotin (UpRi) — NaPi2b-Targeting ADC

NaPi2b (SLC34A2) is expressed in approximately 80% of ovarian cancers — a substantially broader population than FRα. The Phase 1/2 UPLIFT trial (NCT02606305) showed 35% ORR in heavily pre-treated patients (median 4 prior lines). Phase 3 UPLIFT-N is enrolling, comparing UpRi to platinum-based chemotherapy in NaPi2b-positive recurrent HGSOC. The broader target expression could make UpRi relevant to a much larger patient population than mirvetuximab.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-DXd) for HER2-Expressing Ovarian Cancer

HER2 is expressed (IHC 1+ or greater) in approximately 30% of ovarian cancers, though high-level expression (3+) is less common. The DESTINY-PanTumor02 basket trial (NCT04482309) included ovarian cancer patients with HER2 positivity (IHC 2+/3+), showing 45% ORR and 11.1-month median duration of response. These are meaningful numbers in heavily pre-treated disease, and dedicated Phase 2/3 ovarian cancer trials are in design. T-DXd's topoisomerase I inhibitor payload (deruxtecan) also confers a bystander killing effect that may be particularly relevant in tumors with heterogeneous HER2 expression.

Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer: Why It's Hard and What's Being Tried

High-grade serous ovarian cancer is immunologically "cold" — sparse tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, low PD-L1 expression in most tumors, low tumor mutational burden (median 1.7 mutations/megabase), and a strongly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment driven by TGF-beta, IDO1, and regulatory T-cell infiltration. Single-agent checkpoint inhibitors have shown response rates of 8–15% in unselected populations — not clinically meaningful as monotherapy.

But subsets do respond durably, and the 2026 trials are attempting to identify who responds and to expand that fraction through rational combination strategies:

  • PARP + PD-1/PD-L1 combinations: PARP inhibitors increase mutational burden and upregulate PD-L1 — two mechanisms that might sensitize otherwise cold tumors to checkpoint blockade. DUO-O (olaparib + durvalumab + bevacizumab, NCT03737643) reported data in 2025 showing modest improvement in HRD-positive patients; the HRD-negative population showed less benefit.
  • Neoantigen vaccine approaches: Personalized mRNA cancer vaccines encoding patient-specific neoantigens are entering Phase 2 in ovarian cancer in combination with checkpoint inhibitors, based on the KEYNOTE-942 melanoma data. The low mutational burden in HGSOC means fewer neoantigens to target, which is a real constraint — but the vaccine technology may compensate by choosing the most immunogenic subset.
  • Anti-VEGF + checkpoint inhibitor: Bevacizumab targets the immunosuppressive tumor vasculature that limits T-cell infiltration. ATALANTE trial (bevacizumab + atezolizumab) showed benefit in a PD-L1-high subset, suggesting vascular normalization may facilitate immune infiltration in a biomarker-defined population.

Key Clinical and Biomarker Testing Requirements

  • HRD status testing (Myriad myChoice CDx or Foundation Medicine equivalent) is required for PARP inhibitor maintenance eligibility and determines which patients derive the most benefit.
  • FRα expression testing with the FDA-approved companion diagnostic is required before mirvetuximab therapy or mirvetuximab trial enrollment.
  • Germline BRCA1/2 testing is recommended for all women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, with reflex somatic testing if germline testing is negative.
  • HER2 testing (IHC and/or FISH) should be performed at recurrence, particularly in patients with platinum-resistant disease, to determine T-DXd or HER2-directed trial eligibility.
  • Comprehensive genomic profiling (Foundation One CDx or equivalent) at recurrence ensures that rare but actionable alterations — NTRK fusions, MSI-H, NaPi2b overexpression — are not missed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What molecular testing is needed before an ovarian cancer trial?

BRCA1/2 testing (germline and somatic) is essential — germline BRCA1/2 mutations determine eligibility for PARP inhibitor maintenance trials (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib) and BRCA-targeted combinations. HRD (homologous recombination deficiency) testing beyond BRCA — using tests like Myriad myChoice CDx — identifies a broader HRD-positive population (BRCA-mutated plus BRCA-wild-type HRD) eligible for some PARP inhibitor trials. PD-L1 expression and MSI status are required for checkpoint inhibitor trial eligibility. CA-125 trajectory and imaging are standard eligibility assessments but are not molecular tests per se. Comprehensive genomic profiling covers most of this.

What is platinum sensitivity and how does it affect trial eligibility?

Platinum sensitivity (or resistance) is one of the most important stratification factors in ovarian cancer trials. Platinum-sensitive disease is defined as progression-free survival of 6+ months after last platinum chemotherapy; platinum-resistant disease is progression within 6 months. Platinum-refractory disease progresses during platinum treatment. Most maintenance therapy trials (PARP inhibitors in first or second remission) enroll platinum-sensitive patients in complete or partial response. Platinum-resistant trials specifically target this harder-to-treat population with antibody-drug conjugates, immunotherapy combinations, or other non-platinum approaches. Knowing your exact platinum-free interval — and documenting it from your records — is critical before approaching any ovarian cancer trial.

What is PARP inhibitor resistance and are there trials for it?

PARP inhibitor resistance eventually develops in most patients — through mechanisms including restored HR function, reversion mutations in BRCA, and ABCB1 drug efflux pump upregulation. Active trials targeting post-PARP progression include: mirvetuximab soravtansine (an ADC targeting FRα, approved in platinum-resistant disease) for patients with folate receptor alpha expression; antibody-drug conjugates with different payloads (upifitamab rilsedotin, IMGN151 targeting FRα); and combination approaches pairing immunotherapy with novel targets. Several trials specifically enroll BRCA-mutated patients who have progressed on PARP inhibitors, recognizing this as a growing and underserved population with distinct biology.

How do clinical trials fit into ovarian cancer maintenance therapy?

Maintenance therapy — treatment given after response to chemotherapy to delay recurrence — is now standard in ovarian cancer (PARP inhibitors after platinum-based chemotherapy response in BRCA-mutated or HRD-positive disease). Clinical trials are expanding maintenance options: trials testing bevacizumab + PARP inhibitor combinations, trials of next-generation PARP inhibitors with less hematologic toxicity, and trials of immunotherapy in the maintenance setting. For patients completing first-line platinum who achieve response, discussing trial options for maintenance at this point — rather than waiting for recurrence — opens more options. The maintenance setting has been transformed by PARP inhibitor data and remains an active area for novel combinations.

◆ Primary Sources & Further Reading
ClinicalTrials.gov — Recruiting Ovarian Cancer Trials NCI — Ovarian Cancer Research

Related Articles

Oncology
Breast Cancer Clinical Trials 2026
Oncology
Cancer Immunotherapy Trials 2026
Precision Medicine
Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials
EK
◆ Founder & Platform Director
Efi Kara
Electrical & Computer Engineer · 30 years IT management · responsible for platform implementation, editorial direction, and growth strategy.
◆ Research & Analysis
IA
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
Clinical Research Analyst & ISO Inspector

B.Sc. Agricultural Sciences. ISO inspector and compliance auditor. Researches and writes ClinicalMetric Insights using primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov, FDA, EudraCT, PubMed.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-03-15
◆ Medical Review
GA
Georgios Anagas
Medical Content Reviewer

Physiotherapy student. Reviews Insights articles for medical accuracy and patient relevance — condition descriptions, eligibility language, and treatment context for patients and caregivers.

⚕️ Patient-facing medical accuracy review
◆ Technical Review
AA
Achi Anagas
Platform & Data Infrastructure Lead

B.Sc. Informatics & Communications (in progress). Responsible for ClinicalMetric's technical architecture, API integrations with ClinicalTrials.gov, and data accuracy verification.

🔄 Trial data updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Editorial & Research Standards
Stage 1 — Primary Research
ClinicalTrials.gov registry data (NIH/NLM), FDA documentation, EudraCT, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, eligibility, and enrollment data verified at source.
Stage 2 — Medical Accuracy Review
Cross-checked against PubMed/MEDLINE literature and FDA/EMA communications. Eligibility criteria and patient safety information verified for accuracy.
Stage 3 — Registry Verification
Phase classification, enrollment status, sponsor identity, and trial location cross-referenced against official registry records before publication.
⚕️ Medical Disclaimer: ClinicalMetric provides research intelligence only. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making clinical decisions or participating in a trial.
Publisher
ClinicalMetric
Independent Clinical Trial Intelligence
Tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide. Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA IND registry, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register).
Research Methodology
Articles are researched from primary registry sources: ClinicalTrials.gov XML feeds, FDA trial databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, enrollment, and eligibility data is sourced directly from registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.
Primary Data Sources
Accuracy & Updates
Trial status, enrollment, and eligibility information changes frequently. ClinicalMetric syncs with ClinicalTrials.gov daily. Editorial articles are reviewed quarterly or when major protocol amendments are published. Always verify trial status directly on ClinicalTrials.gov before making clinical decisions.
◆ Live Clinical Trial Feed
Browse 400,000+ Active Clinical Trials
Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov · Recruiting trials by condition, phase, sponsor
Search Active Trials →
About ClinicalMetric → Research Methodology → Medical Disclaimer → LinkedIn →

Browse Recruiting Clinical Trials

Find active recruiting trials on ClinicalMetric — updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Browse by Condition →Phase 3 TrialsAll Recruiting Trials

Editorial Notice: This article was reviewed by the ClinicalMetric editorial team. Clinical trial data changes frequently as trials progress, enroll, or close. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. To report an inaccuracy, contact dev@clinicalmetric.com.

◆ Related Research Guides
OncologyAntibody-Drug Conjugates in Clinical Trials 2026: Thirteen Approvals, the Bystander Effect, and the Combination EraRead guide →Immuno-OncologyBispecific Antibodies in Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: Six Approvals, T-Cell Engagers, and the Solid Tumor QuestionRead guide →OncologyBreast Cancer Clinical Trials 2026: ADCs, Immunotherapy & Targeted TherapiesRead guide →OncologyCancer Clinical Trials 2026: Recruiting Oncology Studies — Immunotherapy, CAR-T & Targeted TherapyRead guide →
ClinicalMetric Intelligence Team
Clinical Trial Research & Analysis · Last updated April 2026
Analysis compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA trial registry data, and peer-reviewed clinical research. ClinicalMetric tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide, updated daily from the ClinicalTrials.gov AACT database.
Get Weekly Clinical Trial Alerts
New recruiting trials from NIH, NCI, and 40+ sponsors — every Monday. Free forever.
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence at a Glance
400K+
Active trials tracked
200+
Countries with active trials
4
Clinical trial phases
Daily
Data refresh from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Clinical Trial Phase Transition Success Rates
Phase 1 → Phase 2 success ~63%
Phase 2 → Phase 3 success ~32%
Phase 3 → Approval ~58%
Overall FDA approval rate ~12%
Source: Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) Clinical Development Success Rates — approximate industry averages.
◆ Clinical Trial Development Timeline
Mo 1–6
Preclinical + IND Filing
Mo 6–18
Phase 1 (Safety)
Mo 18–48
Phase 2 (Efficacy)
Mo 48–84
Phase 3 (Pivotal)
Mo 84–96
FDA Review / NDA
Mo 96+
Approval + Phase 4
Timeline is approximate. Total development from preclinical to approval averages 6–13 years.
About the Author
ClinicalMetric Research Team
Clinical Trial Intelligence Specialists · clinicalmetric.com
Our analysts monitor 400,000+ clinical trials daily across oncology, neurology, cardiology, and rare diseases. All data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA.gov.
🔬 400K+ trials tracked 🌍 200+ countries 🔄 Updated: June 2026
◆ Common Questions About Clinical Trials
What is a clinical trial? +
A clinical trial is a research study involving human participants designed to evaluate medical interventions — such as drugs, devices, or behavioral strategies. Trials follow a structured protocol and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. They progress through phases: Phase 1 (safety), Phase 2 (efficacy), Phase 3 (large-scale comparison), and Phase 4 (post-market surveillance).
How do I find clinical trials I'm eligible for? +
You can search ClinicalTrials.gov or use ClinicalMetric to filter by condition, phase, or location. Each trial listing includes eligibility criteria such as age range, sex, diagnosis, and prior treatment history. Contact the study team directly or ask your physician to refer you to a relevant trial.
Are clinical trials safe to participate in? +
Clinical trials are conducted under strict ethical and regulatory oversight, including IRB approval and FDA regulation in the US. All participants must give informed consent after reviewing potential risks and benefits. Phase 1 trials carry more uncertainty, while Phase 3 trials involve interventions with an established safety profile. Participation is always voluntary and you may withdraw at any time.
What are the phases of clinical trials? +
Clinical trials progress through four main phases. Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group (20–80 people). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects in a larger group (100–300). Phase 3 compares the intervention against standard treatments in thousands of participants. Phase 4 occurs after approval and monitors long-term effects in the general population.
Do participants get paid for joining clinical trials? +
Many clinical trials offer compensation for time and travel expenses, though payment structures vary widely by study. Compensation is not intended to be coercive. Some trials also cover treatment costs for participants. Always review the consent form carefully and ask the study coordinator about any financial considerations before enrolling.
Browse by Phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4
Browse by Condition
CancerDiabetesAlzheimer'sDepressionHeart DiseaseCOVID-19Parkinson'sMultiple Sclerosis
ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology