ClinicalMetric Research Team · Last Reviewed: May 2026 · Sources: ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA · NIH
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence — Key Facts
  • 400,000+ active trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov across 200+ countries (2025)
  • Only ~12% of drugs entering clinical trials ultimately receive FDA approval
  • Average clinical trial takes 6–13 years from Phase 1 to regulatory approval
  • ~40% of trials fail to recruit sufficient participants — the #1 reason trials stop early
  • All trials must register on ClinicalTrials.gov under the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 2007)
← Back to Insights
Neurology Last Reviewed: April 2026 CM-INS-043 // MARCH 2026

ALS Clinical Trials 2026: Gene Therapy, Antisense Oligonucleotides & New Treatments

ALS research has been defined by heartbreak — drugs that showed compelling signal in SOD1 mouse models failing completely in humans, a pattern repeated so many times that the field spent years debating whether any preclinical model was trustworthy. The 2022–2024 period was genuinely different. Tofersen's accelerated FDA approval for SOD1-ALS was the first precision ALS therapy in history, the ATLAS trial is treating asymptomatic gene carriers before motor neuron loss begins, and the plasma neurofilament light chain biomarker is compressing trial timelines in ways that weren't possible before it was validated. For patients and families navigating this landscape, the critical skill is distinguishing what's real versus what's promising versus what's been seen before — and all three categories exist in ALS right now.

Medical Notice

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical trial eligibility and availability vary. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making any medical decisions or considering participation in a clinical trial.

Summary

ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) has long been one of medicine's most treatment-resistant diseases, with only two modestly effective FDA-approved drugs for over 25 years (riluzole, 1995; edaravone, 2017). That is changing. Tofersen's April 2023 FDA approval for SOD1-ALS — the first genotype-targeted ALS therapy — established that reducing toxic protein production can slow the biomarkers of neurodegeneration and preserve function. In 2026, the field has extended this approach to C9orf72 and FUS mutations, is testing treatment of asymptomatic gene carriers before symptom onset, and has plasma NfL as a validated surrogate biomarker that enables smaller, faster trials. The setback of Relyvrio's Phase 3 failure in 2023 was a reminder that ALS remains hard — but the precision medicine approach that tofersen represents is generating a different kind of confidence than what came before it.

Tofersen (Qalsody): What the VALOR Trial Actually Showed

SOD1 mutations account for approximately 2% of all ALS cases — roughly 200–300 new diagnoses per year in the US — but have been the focus of intense research because the molecular target is unambiguous. The SOD1 gene encodes superoxide dismutase 1; pathogenic mutations cause misfolding of the SOD1 protein, which is directly toxic to motor neurons. Remove the misfolded protein, and you remove the toxic insult.

Tofersen (Qalsody, Biogen) is an intrathecally administered antisense oligonucleotide that binds to SOD1 mRNA and recruits RNase H to degrade it, reducing SOD1 protein production by approximately 35–40% in the CNS. The VALOR Phase 3 trial (NCT02623699, n=108) did not achieve its primary endpoint — the 28-week change in ALSFRS-R functional score was not statistically different between tofersen and placebo in the full population (p=0.97). But the story is more nuanced than that primary endpoint result suggests, and the FDA's response to it changed how ALS drug development works.

Plasma neurofilament light chain (pNfL) — a protein released into the bloodstream when neurons are damaged — decreased by 55% in tofersen-treated patients versus a 12% increase in placebo patients (p<0.001). pNfL is a validated biomarker of neurodegeneration; it tracks disease progression in ALS more sensitively than functional scales over short time windows. Open-label extension data showed that patients who started tofersen earlier had better functional outcomes than those who crossed over from placebo at 28 weeks — a 2.6 point advantage on ALSFRS-R at 52 weeks that matched the functional impact of 6 months of disease progression. FDA approved tofersen in April 2023 under accelerated approval with pNfL reduction as the surrogate endpoint, acknowledging that confirmatory functional data would be required from ATLAS. This was the first use of a neurodegeneration biomarker as the basis for ALS drug approval.

ATLAS: Treating ALS Before It Starts

The ATLAS trial (NCT04856982, Biogen) is the most ambitious ALS intervention ever attempted. It enrolls adults who carry pathogenic SOD1 mutations and have elevated plasma NfL — evidence that neurodegeneration is already occurring — but who have no clinical symptoms of ALS. These individuals will develop ALS with near-certainty if untreated; the question ATLAS is asking is whether treating them with tofersen before motor neurons are lost can prevent or indefinitely delay symptom onset.

The biological hypothesis is straightforward: if tofersen reduces toxic SOD1 protein production before motor neuron death begins, there may be no threshold of damage to trigger clinical ALS. This is analogous to treating familial hypercholesterolemia before cardiovascular events, or treating HIV before CD4 depletion causes AIDS — targeting the pathophysiology before irreversible organ damage occurs. Plasma NfL normalization toward age-matched controls has been observed in ATLAS participants, confirming target engagement. The primary endpoint is time to clinical ALS diagnosis, which will require years of follow-up to assess definitively. Preliminary data is expected in 2026–2027.

Identification of eligible participants requires genetic testing of first-degree relatives of SOD1-ALS patients — something the ALS community has been systematically working to increase through cascade testing programs. If you have a parent or sibling with confirmed SOD1-ALS, genetic testing is the first step toward ATLAS eligibility.

Extending ASOs to Other Genetic ALS Subtypes

Tofersen's proof of concept — that ASO-mediated reduction of a toxic ALS protein can alter the disease trajectory — has directly motivated parallel programs for other genetic ALS subtypes:

C9orf72-ALS/FTD

C9orf72 hexanucleotide (GGGGCC) repeat expansions are the most common genetic cause of ALS, accounting for approximately 40% of familial and 10% of sporadic ALS cases. The pathogenic mechanism involves both a loss-of-function component (reduced normal C9orf72 protein, which regulates autophagy) and a toxic gain-of-function component (toxic RNA foci and dipeptide repeat proteins generated from the expanded repeat). This dual mechanism complicates ASO design: you want to eliminate the toxic repeat-containing transcripts without completely ablating the normal protein. Wave Life Sciences and Novartis are both advancing intrathecal ASOs targeting C9orf72 in Phase 1/2 trials, with selective targeting of the expanded repeat a key design goal. Phase 1 safety data is expected in 2026.

FUS-ALS: ION363 and the FUSION Trial

FUS mutations cause an aggressive early-onset ALS, often presenting in patients under 40. Ionis Pharmaceuticals developed ION363, an intrathecal ASO targeting FUS mRNA. The program received unusual attention when Jaci Hermstad — a 25-year-old with a de novo FUS mutation — received compassionate-use ION363 and showed disease stabilization for an extended period before eventually progressing. This single-patient experience prompted FDA to expedite a Phase 1/2 trial (FUSION, NCT04768972) that is now actively enrolling adult and pediatric patients with FUS-ALS. No comparative efficacy data exists yet, but FUS-ALS patients and families should contact the principal investigator teams if FUS mutations have been confirmed.

Ataxin-2 (ATXN2) Lowering

Ataxin-2 is a poly-Q protein that stabilizes TDP-43 — the pathological hallmark of approximately 97% of all ALS cases, including most sporadic ALS. TDP-43 aggregation and mislocalization is the final common pathway for motor neuron death in virtually all ALS regardless of genetic background. Reducing ataxin-2 expression via ASO reduces TDP-43 aggregation in mouse models, and this is currently the most promising approach to treating non-SOD1, non-C9orf72 ALS. Ionis Pharmaceuticals' Phase 1 trial of IONIS-ATXN2Rx (NCT04494256) is the most advanced program targeting the TDP-43 pathway in humans. If it demonstrates adequate safety and any reduction in pNfL at Phase 1 doses, it would represent a therapeutic candidate potentially applicable to the majority of ALS patients — a much larger population than SOD1 or C9orf72 alone.

The Relyvrio Setback and What It Means

Relyvrio (sodium phenylbutyrate/ursodoxicoltaurine, AMX0035) was approved by FDA in September 2022 based on a Phase 2 trial (CENTAUR, n=137) that showed a 2.32-point slower decline on ALSFRS-R over 24 weeks versus placebo — roughly equivalent to 25% slower progression. The drug combined an endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibitor (phenylbutyrate) with a mitochondria-protecting bile acid derivative, targeting two stress pathways hypothesized to contribute to motor neuron death.

The confirmatory Phase 3 trial (PHOENIX, n=664, NCT05021536) failed to meet its primary endpoint in September 2023 — no significant difference in ALSFRS-R decline between AMX0035 and placebo. Amylyx Pharmaceuticals voluntarily withdrew the drug from the US market in late 2023, a rapid and responsible decision that few companies would have made given the commercial investment. This was a significant setback, but it also demonstrated the system working as designed: accelerated approval requires confirmatory evidence, and when confirmatory evidence fails, the drug comes off the market. The PHOENIX failure was not a surprise to those who followed the CENTAUR data carefully — the effect size in a 137-patient Phase 2 trial was plausible but not robust, and Phase 3 trials at 5× the sample size regularly fail to confirm Phase 2 signals.

Biomarker Advances: Why pNfL Changed Everything

Plasma neurofilament light chain is now the central pharmacodynamic biomarker in ALS drug development, and its validation has changed trial economics fundamentally. Before pNfL, demonstrating that a drug slowed ALS progression required enrolling 100+ patients and following them for 12–18 months — waiting for measurable functional decline on the ALSFRS-R, which is inherently slow and variable. With pNfL, a drug that engages its target and reduces neurodegeneration can show a statistically significant pNfL reduction in 40–60 patients at 12 weeks — an order-of-magnitude reduction in the time and cost required for a proof-of-concept study.

AI-driven platforms — particularly the PRO-ACT database (5,000+ ALS patient records, Prize4Life) and the Answer ALS project (1,000+ patients with multi-omic, clinical, and wearable data) — are doing exactly what they should: identifying biological subgroups within ALS that may respond differently to different mechanisms, building predictive models of progression rate, and matching patients to trials where they're most likely to show measurable benefit. The still-unsatisfying truth is that ALS is not one disease — SOD1-ALS, C9orf72-ALS, FUS-ALS, and TDP-43-driven sporadic ALS likely have distinct enough biology that one drug will not work across all subtypes. The field is slowly accepting this and designing accordingly.

Key Takeaways

  • Tofersen (Qalsody) is FDA-approved for SOD1-ALS under accelerated approval — the first precision medicine for any ALS subtype. It reduces plasma NfL by ~55% and early-start data suggests functional benefit over delayed treatment.
  • ATLAS (NCT04856982) is treating asymptomatic SOD1 mutation carriers before symptom onset — possibly preventing or delaying ALS indefinitely. Eligible participants are identified by genetic testing; NfL elevation is required for enrollment.
  • ASO programs for C9orf72, FUS, and ATXN2 are in Phase 1/2 trials, following tofersen's proof of concept for genetic targeting in ALS. C9orf72 represents ~40% of familial ALS; ATXN2 targeting could be relevant to virtually all ALS.
  • Relyvrio's Phase 3 failure (PHOENIX, 2023) was a significant setback but also a validation of the confirmatory trial requirement — accelerated approval is provisional, and negative Phase 3 data resulted in appropriate market withdrawal.
  • Plasma NfL as a surrogate biomarker has compressed ALS trial timelines dramatically — enabling proof-of-concept studies in 40–60 patients at 12 weeks versus the 100+ patients at 18 months previously required.
◆ Primary Sources & Further Reading
ClinicalTrials.gov — Recruiting ALS Trials NINDS — ALS Research & Information ALS Association — Trial News & Registry

Related Articles

Neurology
Parkinson's Disease Clinical Trials 2026
Neurology
Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials 2026
Patient Guide
Rare Disease Clinical Trials 2026
CM
ClinicalMetric Editorial Verified Publisher
Clinical Trial Research & Intelligence · Est. 2025

This article was researched and written by the ClinicalMetric editorial team using primary sources: ClinicalTrials.gov registry data (NIH/NLM), FDA trial documentation, peer-reviewed literature from PubMed/MEDLINE, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register). Trial status, eligibility criteria, and enrollment data are sourced directly from official registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.

📅 Last reviewed: 2026-03-15 🔄 Trial data updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Editorial Review Panel
Clinical Trial Research Analyst
ClinicalTrials.gov · FDA registry · trial protocol review
Medical Content Editor
PubMed literature · eligibility criteria · patient safety
Data Accuracy Reviewer
Phase classification · enrollment status · sponsor verification
⚕️ Medical Disclaimer: ClinicalMetric provides research intelligence only. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making clinical decisions or participating in a trial.
Publisher
ClinicalMetric
Independent Clinical Trial Intelligence
Tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide. Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA IND registry, and EudraCT (EU Clinical Trials Register).
Research Methodology
Articles are researched from primary registry sources: ClinicalTrials.gov XML feeds, FDA trial databases, and peer-reviewed literature. Trial status, phase, enrollment, and eligibility data is sourced directly from registry APIs — not secondary aggregators.
Primary Data Sources
Accuracy & Updates
Trial status, enrollment, and eligibility information changes frequently. ClinicalMetric syncs with ClinicalTrials.gov daily. Editorial articles are reviewed quarterly or when major protocol amendments are published. Always verify trial status directly on ClinicalTrials.gov before making clinical decisions.
◆ Live Clinical Trial Feed
Browse 400,000+ Active Clinical Trials
Updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov · Recruiting trials by condition, phase, sponsor
Search Active Trials →
About ClinicalMetric → Research Methodology → Medical Disclaimer → LinkedIn →

Browse Recruiting Clinical Trials

Find active recruiting trials on ClinicalMetric — updated daily from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Browse by Condition →Phase 3 TrialsAll Recruiting Trials

Editorial Notice: This article was reviewed by the ClinicalMetric editorial team. Clinical trial data changes frequently as trials progress, enroll, or close. Nothing on this site constitutes medical advice — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. To report an inaccuracy, contact dev@clinicalmetric.com.

◆ Related Research Guides
NeurologyAlzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials 2026: Leqembi, Kisunla & What's NextRead guide →NeurologyUnderstanding Alzheimer's Treatment Studies: A 2026 GuideRead guide →NeurologyEpilepsy Clinical Trials 2026: New ASMs, Gene Therapy & Drug-Resistant SeizuresRead guide →NeurologyMigraine Clinical Trials 2026: New Preventives, CGRP Inhibitors & Cluster HeadacheRead guide →
ClinicalMetric Intelligence Team
Clinical Trial Research & Analysis · Last updated April 2026
Analysis compiled from ClinicalTrials.gov (NIH/NLM), FDA trial registry data, and peer-reviewed clinical research. ClinicalMetric tracks 400,000+ active clinical trials worldwide, updated daily from the ClinicalTrials.gov AACT database.
Get Weekly Clinical Trial Alerts
New recruiting trials from NIH, NCI, and 40+ sponsors — every Monday. Free forever.
◆ Clinical Trial Intelligence at a Glance
400K+
Active trials tracked
200+
Countries with active trials
4
Clinical trial phases
Daily
Data refresh from ClinicalTrials.gov
◆ Clinical Trial Phase Transition Success Rates
Phase 1 → Phase 2 success ~63%
Phase 2 → Phase 3 success ~32%
Phase 3 → Approval ~58%
Overall FDA approval rate ~12%
Source: Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) Clinical Development Success Rates — approximate industry averages.
◆ Clinical Trial Development Timeline
Mo 1–6
Preclinical + IND Filing
Mo 6–18
Phase 1 (Safety)
Mo 18–48
Phase 2 (Efficacy)
Mo 48–84
Phase 3 (Pivotal)
Mo 84–96
FDA Review / NDA
Mo 96+
Approval + Phase 4
Timeline is approximate. Total development from preclinical to approval averages 6–13 years.
About the Author
ClinicalMetric Research Team
Clinical Trial Intelligence Specialists · clinicalmetric.com
Our analysts monitor 400,000+ clinical trials daily across oncology, neurology, cardiology, and rare diseases. All data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov and FDA.gov.
🔬 400K+ trials tracked 🌍 200+ countries 🔄 Updated: May 2026
◆ Common Questions About Clinical Trials
What is a clinical trial? +
A clinical trial is a research study involving human participants designed to evaluate medical interventions — such as drugs, devices, or behavioral strategies. Trials follow a structured protocol and are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. They progress through phases: Phase 1 (safety), Phase 2 (efficacy), Phase 3 (large-scale comparison), and Phase 4 (post-market surveillance).
How do I find clinical trials I'm eligible for? +
You can search ClinicalTrials.gov or use ClinicalMetric to filter by condition, phase, or location. Each trial listing includes eligibility criteria such as age range, sex, diagnosis, and prior treatment history. Contact the study team directly or ask your physician to refer you to a relevant trial.
Are clinical trials safe to participate in? +
Clinical trials are conducted under strict ethical and regulatory oversight, including IRB approval and FDA regulation in the US. All participants must give informed consent after reviewing potential risks and benefits. Phase 1 trials carry more uncertainty, while Phase 3 trials involve interventions with an established safety profile. Participation is always voluntary and you may withdraw at any time.
What are the phases of clinical trials? +
Clinical trials progress through four main phases. Phase 1 tests safety and dosing in a small group (20–80 people). Phase 2 evaluates efficacy and side effects in a larger group (100–300). Phase 3 compares the intervention against standard treatments in thousands of participants. Phase 4 occurs after approval and monitors long-term effects in the general population.
Do participants get paid for joining clinical trials? +
Many clinical trials offer compensation for time and travel expenses, though payment structures vary widely by study. Compensation is not intended to be coercive. Some trials also cover treatment costs for participants. Always review the consent form carefully and ask the study coordinator about any financial considerations before enrolling.
Browse by Phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3Phase 4
Browse by Condition
CancerDiabetesAlzheimer'sDepressionHeart DiseaseCOVID-19Parkinson'sMultiple Sclerosis
ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology