← Back to Clinical Trials
Recruiting NCT06821516

NCT06821516 Comparison of Pain Relief Methods for Hip Surgery: A Study on Two Different Nerve Block Techniques

◆ AI Clinical Summary
Plain-language summary for patients
Clinical Trial Summary
NCT ID NCT06821516
Status Recruiting
Phase
Sponsor Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Condition Opioid Consumption, Postoperative
Study Type INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment 52 participants
Start Date 2025-01-21
Primary Completion 2026-03-01

Trial Parameters

Condition Opioid Consumption, Postoperative
Sponsor Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital
Study Type INTERVENTIONAL
Phase N/A
Enrollment 52
Sex ALL
Min Age 18 Years
Max Age N/A
Start Date 2025-01-21
Completion 2026-03-01
Interventions
Evaluation of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of PENG block in participants undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesiaEvaluation of the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of lumbar erector spinae block in participants undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia

Eligibility Fast-Check

Enter your details for a quick preliminary check. This does not replace medical advice.

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized comparative study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESP) groups to relieve postoperative pain in participants over the age of 18 undergoing total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. The main question it aims to answer is: To demonstrate whether PENG block or L-ESP block is more effective in postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty surgery based on pain scores, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction. Total hip arthroplasties cause severe pain with movement in the postoperative period. After surgery, the movements of the participants are severely restricted, which increases the possibility of complications. In this study, the participants' pain status, VAS score, opioid consumption through patient-controlled analgesia, and patient satisfaction will be measured with a questionnaire for 24 hours at predetermined time points and then compared. Both types of blocks have pain-relieving effects. This study will only investigate which one is more effective in reducing pain, and there will be no deficiency in relieving the pain of the participants.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: * Voluntary willingness to participate in the study. * Patients who will undergo Total Hip Arthroplasty surgery. * Patients aged over 18 years. * ASA score I-II-III. * Patients who are fully oriented and can cooperate. Exclusion Criteria: * ASA score IV-V. * Patients who refuse to participate in the study. * Patients under 18 years of age. * Presence of active infection in the area to be operated on. * Chronic pain and continuous analgesic use. * Patients with coagulation disorders. * Patients who cannot cooperate with postoperative pain follow-up. * Patients with allergies to local anesthetic agents. * Presence of neuropathy or myopathy in the operated extremity.

Related Trials

ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology