← Back to Clinical Trials
Recruiting Phase 3 NCT07322848

NCT07322848 DEB-TACE vs cTACE in HCC After TIPS

◆ AI Clinical Summary
Plain-language summary for patients
Clinical Trial Summary
NCT ID NCT07322848
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 3
Sponsor First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Condition Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Study Type INTERVENTIONAL
Enrollment 206 participants
Start Date 2025-12-01
Primary Completion 2029-12-31

Trial Parameters

Condition Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Sponsor First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Study Type INTERVENTIONAL
Phase Phase 3
Enrollment 206
Sex ALL
Min Age 18 Years
Max Age 75 Years
Start Date 2025-12-01
Completion 2029-12-31
Interventions
DEB-TACEcTACE

Eligibility Fast-Check

Enter your details for a quick preliminary check. This does not replace medical advice.

Brief Summary

This is a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) compared with Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization (cTACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that is beyond the Milan criteria and who have previously undergone a Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) procedure. The TIPS procedure is commonly performed to manage complications of portal hypertension, such as variceal bleeding or refractory ascites, in patients with cirrhosis. However, after TIPS, treatment options for HCC-particularly in cases exceeding the Milan criteria-remain limited and not well-defined in current guidelines. While TACE is a standard locoregional therapy for intermediate-stage HCC, its application in patients with a prior TIPS is controversial due to altered hepatic hemodynamics, which may increase the risk of liver toxicity and compromise treatment safety and efficacy. Preliminary retrospective data suggest that DEB-TACE, which uses calibrated drug-eluting microspheres, may offer a safer and more effective alternative to cTACE in this specific patient population by providing more controlled drug delivery and potentially reducing systemic and hepatic toxicity. The primary objective of this study is to determine whether DEB-TACE improves Overall Survival (OS) compared to cTACE in patients with beyond-Milan HCC after TIPS. Secondary objectives include comparing the safety profile, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Quality of Life (QoL) between the two treatment arms. The study aims to enroll 206 participants who will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DEB-TACE or cTACE. The trial will include a 24-month recruitment period and a 24-month treatment and follow-up phase, with a total study duration of 48 months. By directly comparing these two TACE approaches in a prospectively defined and randomized setting, this study seeks to provide high-level evidence to guide the optimal locoregional treatment strategy for HCC patients with a history of TIPS placement.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1. histologically or clinically confirmed primary hepatocellular carcinoma, beyond Milan criteria (single lesion \>5 cm OR ≥3 lesions with at least one ≥3 cm). At least one intrahepatic measurable lesion with tumor burden ≤50%, no distant metastasis. No prior antitumor therapy within 12 months before enrollment. 2. underwent TIPS procedure for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding or refractory ascites. Confirmed patent TIPS at 1-month follow-up with portosystemic blood flow visible throughout the shunt and Doppler velocity \> 60 cm/s. 3. child-Pugh class A or B. 4. estimated survival ≥3 months. 5. adequate organ function:Neutrophils ≥1.5 × 10⁹/L; Platelets ≥50 × 10⁹/L; Hemoglobin ≥90 g/L; Serum albumin ≥30 g/L; Bilirubin ≤50 μmol/L; AST/ALT ≤5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP ≤4 × ULN; INR ≤2.3; Creatinine ≤1.5 × ULN. Exclusion Criteria: 1. diffuse hepatic infiltration, unassessable lesions on imaging, or tumor burden \>50%. 2. simultaneous portal vein branch

Related Trials

Related Intelligence Guides

In-depth guides covering this condition's trials, eligibility, and what to expect.

ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology