← Back to Clinical Trials
Recruiting NCT06398288

Adjunctive Use of Dermal Matrix to Compensate Dimensional Changes in the Reconstructive Therapy of Peri-implantitis

◆ AI Clinical Summary
Plain-language summary for patients

Trial Parameters

Condition Peri-Implantitis
Sponsor Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Badajoz, Spain
Study Type INTERVENTIONAL
Phase N/A
Enrollment 48
Sex ALL
Min Age 18 Years
Max Age 80 Years
Start Date 2024-03-01
Completion 2025-03-01
Interventions
Dermal matrix (Oracell, LifeNet, USA)No dermal matrix

Eligibility Fast-Check

Enter your details for a quick preliminary check. This does not replace medical advice.

Brief Summary

One critical element regarded to successfully resolve peri-implantitis is to efficiently decontaminate the contaminated implant surface. Mechanical, pharmacological and chemical strategies have been proposed to eliminate bacterial plaque and remnants from the implant surface. However, evidence has not demonstrated superiority of a given detoxification agent/strategy. Recently, the electrolytic approach has been indicated for the surgical detoxification in the management of peri-implantitis. For the electrolytic approach (EA) the implant has to be loaded negatively with a voltage and a maximum current of 600 mA. This is achieved by a device (GS1000, GalvoSurge Dental AG, Widnau, Switzerland) providing the voltage and pumping a sodium formiate solution through a spray-head, which has to be pressed into the implant by finger pressure to achieve an electrical contact. Another critical aspect in the management of peri-implantitis is related to the esthetic sequelae associated with disease resolution. Sanz-Martin et al. in a systematic review demonstrated that reconstructive therapy is less prone to exhibit mucosal recession when compared to resective therapy. Nonetheless, it seems to be unavoidable no matter the surgical intervention. Aiming at attenuating these changes, Schwarz et al. noted that the adjunctive use of connective tissue grafts may enhance the height of the mucosal level, which in turn may impact upon the esthetic outcome. Therefore, the research question is the following: What is the clinical, radiographic and 3D volumetric effectiveness of dermal matrix to improve the outcome of reconstructive therapy of peri-implantitis-related bone defects? The study is to be performed in two centers: Center of Implantology, Oral and Maxillofacial in Badajoz (Spain) and Clinical PerioCentrum Ortiz-Vigon in Bilbao (Spain)

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria: * Diagnosed with peri-implantitis-related intrabony defects * All subjects had dental implants with screw-retained or cement-retained fixed or removable implant-supported prosthesis for a minimum of 36 months. * All patients in age of 18 to 80, non-smokers * With no presence of systemic disease or medication known to alter bone metabolism, and partial or complete edentulous patients that have no active periodontal disease. Exclusion criteria: * Peri-implantitis-related supra-crystal or combined defects * Pregnancy or lactation * History of or current smokers * Uncontrolled medical conditions, * Cement-retained restorations, * Lacking keratinized mucosa (≤2mm) on the lingual or buccal implant sites.

Related Trials

ClinicalMetric — Independent clinical trial intelligence platform. Not affiliated with NIH, ClinicalTrials.gov, the U.S. FDA, or any pharmaceutical company, hospital, or clinical research organization. Trial data is sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Do not make any treatment, enrollment, or health decisions based solely on information found here — always consult a qualified healthcare professional. Full Disclaimer  ·  Last Reviewed: April 2026  ·  Data Methodology
}