A Randomised Clinical Investigation to Assess Efficacy of Low Volume Transanal Irrigation by Qufora® IrriSedo MiniGo Versus Conservative Treatment for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Patients
Trial Parameters
Brief Summary
The purpose of this post-market clinical follow up study is to assess the efficacy on clinical symptoms of LARS of low volume Transanal Irrigation by MiniGo in conjunction with conservative treatment versus conservative treatment at 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Adult aged from 18 years 2. Patients electively treated for rectal cancer with a low anterior resection 3. Between 3 and 18 months after the conservative colorectal surgery or 3 and 18 months after the stoma reversal if applicable 4. LARS score \>= 25 (minor or major LARS) (Emmertsen and Laurberg 2012) AND LARS definition as consensus with at least one symptom that results in at least one consequence (Keane et al. 2020) 5. Adult for whom previous conservative treatments were started for at least a month 6. Mental and physical capability of the patient to handle the MiniGo by himself. 7. Check of the anastomosis (no signs of leakage or clinical relevant stenosis) and absence of local recurrence by Rectal digital examination of the anastomosis, any other exam used in the current practice 8. Patient affiliated to the health social security system Exclusion Criteria: 1. Contra-indication to use TAI 2. Former use of TAI (post colo-rectal surgery) 3. Clinically relevan